Class Notes (835,428)
Canada (509,186)
York University (35,236)
Psychology (4,108)
PSYC 2130 (210)
all (3)
Lecture

PSYC 2130 Chapter 6.docx

3 Pages
154 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC 2130
Professor
All Professors
Semester
Winter

Description
PSYC 2130 Chapter 6: Personality judgment in daily life Consequences of everyday judgments of personality - Opportunities: Reputations affects opportunities in numerous ways. - People judge the personalities of each other and of themselves all the time and these judgments have important consequences - Expectancy effects: Other people’s judgments of an individual can affect that person’s opportunities and can create self fulfilling prophecies or expectancy effects. Therefore, it is important to examine when and how judgments are accurate. The accuracy of personality judgment - For an extended period of time, psychologists went out of their way to avoid researching accuracy. - The most basic reason why accuracy experienced this lengthy hiatus, is that researchers were stymied by a fundamental problem: by what criteria can personality judgements made by somebody else be judged right or wrong. - This point of view is bolstered by the philosophy of constructivism, which is widespread throughout modern intellectual life. This philosophy holds that reality as a concrete entity does not exist. All that does exist are human ideas, or constructions, of reality. - If a tree falls in the forest with no one to hear, does it make a noise? The constructivist answer is no. A more important implication is that there is no way to regard one interpretation of reality as accurate and another interpretation as inaccurate, because all interpretations are mere social constructions. - The philosophy of critical realism holds that the absence of perfect, infallible criteria for determining the truth does not mean that all interpretations of reality are equally correct. - Evaluating a personality judgment is no different. You must gather all the information that might help you determine whether or not the judgment is valid, and then make the best determination you can. - Recent research has evaluated the accuracy of personality judgments in terms of consensus and predictive validity. Judgments that agree with judgments from other sources (such as other people) or that are able to predict the target person’s behaviour are more likely to be accurate than judgments that do not agree with each other or cannot predict behaviour. - Convergent validation is a well developed and widely accepted method for assessing test validity. It can be illustrated by the duck test. This method is achieved by assembling diverse pieces of information, such as appearance, walking and swimming style, and quackiness that converge on a common conclusion: it must be a duck. The more items of diverse information the converge, the more confident one is in the conclusion -
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 2130

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit