Class Notes (836,562)
Canada (509,854)
York University (35,328)
Psychology (4,108)
PSYC 2130 (210)

May 23rd Lecture.docx

4 Pages
Unlock Document

PSYC 2130
Krista Phillips

PSYC 2130 Lecture 5 According to the Bem measurement  If the person is low in Masculinity and high in femininity Feminine  If the person is high in masculinity and low in femininity masculine  If the person in low in both un-differential  If the person is high in both androgynous 1. Historical Overview  It have been around the time since the ancient Greek  2. Early Typologies  Kretschmer’s Somatotype Theory 3. Trait Approacheswhatever the based assumption about trait approach is that it is temporal stability. Another assumption is that traits are situational stability. Trait vary according to the number of traits considered to be basic, where those traits come from, and the type of data they generate – don’t share a common methodology. Type approach was shift to the trait approach. It’s easy to be seduced into thinking that traits are measurable. The most conservative way to think of traits is that they are still theoretical concepts that describe a basic dimension of personality. BIG 5 are the best-known trait test; it came from lexical analysis – came from the anaylsis people used to discribe other people. Two theories that are true able personality is they are stable over time and stable across situations. The traits battle persisted for 35 years. In clinical psychology trait measures are used all the time.  Differences in taxonomy o There are many tests out there today which measure personality it is just up to you on which you want to use.  Differences in ideas concerning origins o There are biological trait theories o Some of them give greater weight to environmental traits  Differences in type of data generated o Some theorist use self report tests o Some give way to case histories. 4. Main Assumptions of trait theories  Temporal and situational stability 5. Criticisms of the Trait Approach  Trait theories are always used in clinical psychology and they don’t see it.  It was spearheaded by Mischel who was the first to o He say whene you take a test like the MMPI, the psychologist who interrupts the test, that scores represent how much of that thing you are. o Sign vs. samples  The responses on the personality tests are interpreted as signs as that is how that person is, he said instead of personality assessment being based on sign they should rather be based on samples. o Much of his attack on the trait perspective is that traits do not allow us to predict what someone will do later on accurately. o He argues that personality tests are used in a way that influences peoples life. o Traits are mythical to him 2 o He gave us the concept of P personality coefficient r= .03 describes the average relationship on how people response on trait measures and in real life. o His argument was if the situation more important than the person than there is any trait assessments that can measure personality.  Skinner he said the trait approach is vulnerable to logical error. Trait approach just describes the behaviour and does not give a explanation, which leads people to believe that the description of behaviour in the explanation.  Fundamental flaw in trait approach because we 6. Gordon Allporthis research was the first to have his work in the 1920s recognized. He is usually credited for doing the ground breaking research of personality traits. He taught the first course on personality. He is important to people who want to study individual difference. He did his distoratation on personality at Harvard. He knew a great deal of learning/behaviourism theory because Skinner was also at Harvard the same time he was there. He said the both psychoanalysis and behaviourism is very reductionistic; he walked away from this because he though both were very limited. He also found Freudianism as being reductionistic as well because Freud break the person into compartments. Personality is the dynamic organization of psychophysical system that controls systems and thoughts his definition. He was trying to say the personality is a combination of bother the mind on body and not two separate things, they play a causal role. Trait psychology should pay more attention to conscious self reports.  Nomothetic vs. idiographic methods o Nomothetic group data  Your always looking at your subject in the context as a sample o He rather than forcing all your subjects into categories that are meaningful to you, there is also value in the idiographic approach which identifying the unique individual  The person identifies the personality traits and not the researcher and they should value what people have to say about themselves and to take the information they provide to face value.  He illustrated the personal
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 2130

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.