Class Notes (837,490)
Canada (510,274)
York University (35,409)
Psychology (4,109)
PSYC 3140 (168)
Lecture 4

Abnormal psychology 3230 - lecture 4.docx

6 Pages
53 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC 3140
Professor
James Alcock
Semester
Winter

Description
January 28 , 2013 Tahreem Mahmood Lecture 4 Abnormal Psychology -Psych 3230 Lecture 4: Assessment and Research Scientist-Practitioner Model  Clinical psychology is about 100 years old  Grounded in psychological research  1949, Boulder Conference on Graduate Education in psychology o Developed a model of training o Clinical psychologists to be trained BOTH as scientists and as practitioners  Clinical psychologist should use their training as scientist researcher to guide their practice o Evaluate client progress o Apply critical thinking o Employ empirically – supported techniques o Practice is formed by research literature Clinical Vs. Statistical Prediction  Statistical (actual) method – classify the individual in terms of similar cases (nomothetic) – as in testing.  Clinical method – attempting to understand the individual apart from other cases (idiographic) o Advocates argue that psychological causation is always personal and never actuarial o Gordon Allport in the 1940s;  We should discard all predictions based on class membership, e.g., actuarial predictions o Example (G. Allport, 1942, p.157):  Is 80 percent of delinquents from broken homes are recidivists, it does not follow that a single delinquent from a broken home as an 80% probability of becoming a recidivist  Probability is based on frequencies obtained across repeated trials. However, a particular delinquent represents only a single trial  If we know all the variables that are related to recidivism then we would be able to predict the delinquent’s outcome with certainty.  Paul Meehl (1954) Clinical verses Statistical Prediction argued against this view: o We can use statistical predictors, based on categories; why not use them if they give 70 or 80% certainty? o For Allport, only if all predictors were known should we use category membership, for then, we would predict with reasonable (near 100%) certainty. January 28 , 2013 Tahreem Mahmood Lecture 4 Abnormal Psychology -Psych 3230  Meehl reviewed empirical comparisons of statistical (actuarial) and clinical predictions of outcomes: o Success in training programs o Recidivism o Recovery from psychosis  Meehl (1954) found 16 studies o “in all but one , predictions made actuarially were either approximately equal or superior to those made by a clinician” (p. 119)  We know now that for example, interviews even by highly skilled interviewers are not as accurate as when tests are used or when interviews are supplemented by tests  Similarly for diagnosis  Yet there often seems to be something disturbing about using a statistical approach o E.G. – Likelihood that an offender will reoffend.  The temptation is always to let the experience take over statistical (actuarial factors) o E.G. – likelihood an individual will become violent  Nobody can predict violence – we shouldn’t pretend that we can o E.G. – For admission to graduate school.  You have to take a balanced approach – Not depend a lot on GRE’s (graduate examination) Methods of Assessment  Interviews  Objective tests  Projective tests – there is no evidence that they are still useful  Physiological measures – these aren’t used too often – e.g. galvanic skin response or finger temperature Clinical interview  Can be structured, semi-structured, or unstructured  What do we want to find out? o Life history -- find out how the person’s life has been so far (getting some information about their life is critical) o Apparent problem o Stresses o Mental status examination January 28 , 2013 Tahreem Mahmood Lecture 4 Abnormal Psychology -Psych 3230  Mental status examination -- a semi structured part of clinical interview o Clinical observes and asks questions  Appearance – does it appear that this person isn’t looking after themselves  Behaviour  Sensorium (five senses working properly?)  Orientation – does the person look in your eye  Affect – emotion  Memory, intelligence, thought process and content  Insight, judgement Test Construction  Reliability concerns o Internal consistency – degree of reliability within a test o Temporal stability (test-retest reliability) o Inter-rater reliability – is the test independent of the rating of the person?  Validity concerns o Content validity – does it tap a representative sample of behaviours we consider important o Criterion validity  Concurrent validity: does it distinguish between groups – e.g. depressed and
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 3140

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit