Class Notes (838,375)
Canada (510,867)
York University (35,470)
Psychology (4,109)
PSYC 3310 (80)
Lecture

Ch. 6: Eyewitness Identification

5 Pages
114 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC 3310
Professor
Gwen Jenkins
Semester
Summer

Description
Ch. 6: Eyewitness Identification Tuesday, June 05, 2012:39 PM Where is the focus of your attention? - Armed robbery - Ask? What do you think the couple leaving the shop were able to tell the police? - The eye tends to focus on one thing at a time, generally whatever is moving. Static information is sacrificed. - To attend to static information, we have to choose to ignore moving information. Howuseful is eyewitness testimony? - Goal of police is to "clear" crimes, rates low ○ Cleared by charge (cbc) = proceeded to trial ○ Cleared otherwise = offender known, no trial - Violations against person (cbc) (Stats Can, 2003) ○ [The rates against people are much more likely to be cleared than violations against property] Problems with Eyewitness Testimony - Eyewitness evidence is extremely influential at trial, but eyewitnesses often inaccurate ○ E.g., Thomas Sophonow case ○ Wells (1993) examined 40 cases of wrongful convictions-- accused falsely identified in 90% ○ Innocence Project - Eyewitness evidence may be 'traded' ○ E.g., Rubin 'Hurricane' Carter MistakenConvictionof Rubin "Hurricane" Carter The "Hurricane": Prior Criminal Record - Age 14, assault & robbery, escaped juvenile reformatory - Joined army at age 17, discharged "Unfit for military service" at age 19 - Returned to reformatory-- arrested for street muggings after release ○ Pleaded guilty, spent 4 years in New Jersey State Prison (maximum-security) The "Hurricane": Eyewitness Testimony - Alfred Bello (burglar), testified that he saw 2 black males, 1 with a shotgun, 1 with a pistol-- get into white car - Patricia Graham (witness) testified she was 2 black males get in white car & drive away - Ronald Ruggiero (witness) testified he heard screech of tires & saw white car with 2 black males in front seat - Carter's car matched witnesses' description - Carter & Artis did not match descriptions given by injured eye witness - None of eyewitnesses, nor injured parties, identified Carter or Artis as shooters - Polygraph: Carter "attempting deception to all pertinent questions… was involved in this crime" - Carter & Artis released - Bello & accomplice changed story, identified Carter & Artis as the black males seen - Bello & accomplice changed story, identified Carter & Artis as the black males seen Systemvs. Estimator Variables - Eyewitness accuracy influenced by two factors: 1. System variables-- preventable errors  Police procedures, e.g., type of questioning, nature of lineup 2. Estimator variables-- not preventable  E.g., lighting at scene, length of exposure - How can psychologists help? ○ Improve police procedures (system variables) ○ Explain/testify about fallibility of eye witness testimony evidence (estimator variables) Improper PoliceProcedures - One goal of forensic psychology is to "make eyewitness identification a product of memory, not police procedure" (p. 120, text) - The Case of Tony Ford ○ Currently on Death Row in Texas ○ 5th Circuit Court of Appeals denied his appeal.  One issue at appeal: denial of funds to hire expert, Professor Malpass, to identify on eyewitness identification issues in the case TonyFord - El Paso Eyewitness Lab ○ Malpass evaluated line-up used in investigation resulting in Ford's identification ○ Witnesses gave poor verbal descriptions of perpetrator - No useful verbal descriptions available in record ○ 20 participants shown line-up photo of Ford and asked to give descriptions ○ Composite description:  African American male, early 20s, dark hair  Oval face, broad forehead  Small, dark eyes, thin eyebrows  Wide nose, thick lips, small protruding ears Ford: Amicus brief - "Psychological research shows that contextual conditions… have a dramatic effect on a witness's ability to identify the perpetrator" -- all factors present in Ford's case 1. Weapon Focus - Presence of weapon during crime reduces witness's ability to recall other details and correctly identify perpetrator - Ford case, eyewitnesses testified… □ Gun was continuously pointed at them during incident □ Perpetrators used gun to threaten them, one eyewitness shot 2. Stress/Violence - Highly stressful/violent events increase likelihood that witness will misidentify perpetrator - Less able to recall details correctly - Memories less accurate - Memories less accurate - Increases risk of "false-positive" identifications 3. "Forgetting Curve" - Witness's ability to correctly identify a perpetrator decreases rapidly over time - Ford case, one eyewitness identified Ford from photo array one day after incident, the other eyewitnesses nine days later 4. Assimilation (memories & suggestibility) - Exposure to outside information/subtle suggestions regarding identity of perpetrator can alter memories □ Witnesses who receive information about what another person saw often incorporate that info into their own reports □ Exposing witnesses to photographs of an individual described as a "suspect" had highly biasing effect on later identification (Behrman & Vayder, 1994) 5. Police Procedures (Wells, more later) 6. Cross-Racial Identification - Witnesses of one race more likely to falsely identify person of another race - Ford case, eyewitnesses Mexican-American, Ford African-American 7. Confidence of Witness - Post-identification confidence has little relation to accuracy - Eyewitness confidence can
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 3310

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit