Class Notes (806,874)
Canada (492,493)
York University (33,494)
Social Science (2,973)
SOSC 1350 (235)
d (2)

Gender and The Law - Introduction to Canadian Law.docx

3 Pages
Unlock Document

York University
Social Science
SOSC 1350

Two major traditions of law at work - Common Law - Civil Law Common Law - English form of law. The common law system in Canada was developed by the English in the middle ages. Countries that have common law include UK, Ireland, US, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, South Africa, Singapore, Hong Kong, Australia, New Zealand. Through adoption or imposition, British Colonialism and Imperialism ensured spreading of common law. After decline of the empire, most countries kept the common law system. Civil Law Developed in the roman empire, and rediscovered in Europe in the Middle Ages. Like Common Law, Civil Law spread through colonialism and imperialism. (French & Spanish). The scope of Civil Law in Canada is wider than that of Common law. Exists in most of Europe, Africa, Asia. France has always seemed to embody the civil law system. In canada to a limited degree with Quebec. In Canada there is a mostly common law system, with a mix of civil and common in Quebec. Differences The original difference is that historically, common law is developed on custom. Began before there were written laws. When there were written laws, those customs were applied by courts, written down. Civil Law relies on a very very detailed code, relies much on traditions. Three famous codes are: Corpus Juris Civilis, Napoleonic Code, Civil Code of Quebec. People in civil law jurisdictions like Quebec can look to the code on any matter for resolutions. Civil Law - predictable. Common Law - relies on the body of precedents that are set by judges. Sources of Canadian Law Number of different sources. Two basic ways in which law is made in canada. - Politicians make laws Federal - MPs, Senators, Queen/GG Provincial - MPPs/MLAs, Lieutenant Governor Municipal - Councilors Aboriginal People self government does not exist in any significant way. - Judges make laws Technically, judges interpret law - not make law. However, in applying the law, the judges are interpreting the law and therefore making law. Precedent = prior judges' decisions are binding on current and future judges. IN a common law system, judges originally believed that they were not making laws. Judge
More Less

Related notes for SOSC 1350

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.