Class Notes (835,539)
Canada (509,225)
York University (35,236)
Social Science (3,019)
SOSC 2350 (212)
Dena Demos (81)

SOSC 2350 Note 4.docx

6 Pages
Unlock Document

Social Science
SOSC 2350
Dena Demos

SOSC 2350 Note 4 The Canadian Constitution and Charter - “Constitutional law is the law prescribing the exercise of power by the organs of a State. It explains which organs can exercise legislative power, executive power, and what the limitations on those powers are. - Entrenched law: constitutional law entrenched legislation, meaning that it can only be changed by a specific amending, formula (only if there is agreement from the federal government and every provincial government) o It becomes consistent, constant; real. o Only if the provincial and federal government - Every province has a veto: they can say if they object Constitution Act, 1867 - Also known before 1982 as the British North America Act o Unites the then-existing four provinces of BNA as the Dominion of Canada.  Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick o Sets out a basic structure of Canadian Government o Divides power between Federal and provincial o Canada has a federal system of government - What was missing? o There was no formula  It was an Imperial Statute, and could only be changed by the act of the U.K. Parliament.  Statute: different from law in that its not made by legislative bodies o No individual rights (of citizens),  Fits well with the idea that it’s an act of imperial power, because there’s no equality in a broader sense of liberal democracy. o Limited constitutional recognition for the rights of native peoples. Canadian Bill of Rights (1960) - Before the Bill of Rights and the Charter - Courts tried cases where statutes were alleged to violate fundamental freedoms - SCC based its decisions on either the exclusivity of federal powers, or the “peace, order, and good government” clause of the BNA Act. Constitution Act, 1982 - Added amendment formula which called for the “Patriation of the constitution” o Patriation is making it your own. Making it part of the identity (because the BNA was made by outside of the Canadian body) - Added the Charter of Rights and Freedoms (made up for the absence of individual rights). - Added an explicit constitutional recognition of treaty rights for aboriginal peoples of Canada - It wasn’t accepted by Quebec and was adopted over Quebec’s objections. The Charter - S.1. Rights guaranteed subject to reasonable limitation. - S.2. Fundamental Freedoms - S.3-5 Democratic Rights - S.6: Mobility rights - Ss.7-14 legal rights - S.15. Equality Rights - S.16-23: Language and Minority Language Rights - S.24: Enforcement provisions. - We made these vague because we didn’t know such things were allowed and how things might’ve changed in the social norms Limitations Clause - Sets out a two-part test to determine whether federal or provincial law can override a constitutional guarantee of protection within the Charter - First, the federal or provincial statutes’ limits on rights must be reasonable; - Second, courts must be satisfied that the limits are demonstrably justified. o Controversies:  Charter set out a new framework for interpreting the law in Canada  However: not clear about what change this would make in Canadian democracy  This cannot be predicted  This would only be answered over time  Can only be built, critiqued over time: we don’t know how things will change in the future.  Whether this would help regulate, and support our identity of our culture. o Criticisms of the courts:  Charter seemed to move the focus away from democratic institutions like Parliament  Since they’re appointed and not elected, they don’t represent the citizens as well  Moves towards question of individual rights and thus to the courts.  Courts have much more say about identities and freedoms because it is the judges who determine by hand. Parliamentary Supremacy - The parliament is the supreme lawmaker of the land. o The belief is the focus stone of democracy  Because we elect them, they represent the wants and needs of Canada’s on our behalf. - Counter argument: o There is a core of values to which all Canadians subscribe, enunciated first in the Bill of Rights and later in the Charter.  There’s a need that some Canadians have. That is something that is put forward and representative of legal identity and legal values o This core of values must be protected at all times, regardless of whims of legislature  They’re thought to endure overtime. It can’t be overturned in separate different cases.  Depending on the whims of economy, parties, and it will still endure. Only can be changed by a radical decision Judicial Activism (seen as negative) - Black’s Law dictionary: “A philosophy of judicial decision making whereby judges allow their personal views about public policy, among other factors, to guide their decisions, usually with the suggestion that adherents of this philosophy tend to find constitutional violations and are willing to ignore precedent. o As an excuse to change the law, curb things to their personal philosophy. - Pejorative term for the misuse of judicial woer. -
More Less

Related notes for SOSC 2350

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.