Class Notes (836,153)
Canada (509,662)
York University (35,302)
Social Science (3,019)
SOSC 2350 (212)
Dena Demos (81)

SOSC 2350 Note 8.docx

7 Pages
Unlock Document

Social Science
SOSC 2350
Dena Demos

SOSC 2350 Note 8: The Sociology of Weber and Durkheim Max Weber - What constitutes order? o Order exists when conduct is oriented to maxims  The universal rules orienting our rules, which “ought” to be the case for everyone.  Consciously or unconsciously take into consideration some stable set of commonly accepted assumptions and rules of behaviour  Individuals may orient their conduct to the maxims because of coercive sanctions or because they feel the law is legitimate.  There is no unique cause (not singular), but rather several forces together exerting at the same time - Two dimensions of law: o Rational  Follows general criteria applicable to all (assumption) o Irrational  When all similar cases are dealt with informally. o Formal (application of rules and procedures that are internal to any given legal system)  Making things equal to all. o Substantive (the application of rules and procedures that are outside of the formal system, i.e. employing external criteria) - Degree’s of Rationality/Formality o Formally Irrational:  To make one’s decision according to laws of the universe  Decision making rests on making, the oracle, or the revelation o Substantively irrational: each individual example are what determines the decision. Each case employs any one of a number of ethical, political, ideological, moral or emotional considerations. o Formally Rational: Internal rules are applied to all similarly situated cases in an identical manner. Here rules are abstract and general. Looking at the broad picture  Not looking at the circumstances at hand.  See all individuals as “individuals” not “Jeff, Sally, etc.” o Substantively Rational: Examples include plea-bargaining, affirmative action, the defence of necessity, UN definition of human rights  They focus on the specific case of the individual - Weber’s theory of Authority o Two features:  General notion of authority  Division of different forms of authority into three pure types: traditional, legal-rational, and charismatic. o Authority is one form of power the most stable and enduring form.  Not a physical compulsion, but a belief in the binding quality of the certain normative principles.  These norms exist for good reason, and they are essentially true.  King has power because subjects think his orders are righteous and consider themselves obligated to obey. - Traditional Theory of Authority o Modeled on the relation between a “master” and a “servant” o Fundamental difference in social position/natural endowments  Social hierarchy justified by a “natural” order o Based on a model of an orderly household; natural participation and routine. o Relies upon seeing social hierarchy as a natural order to the universe. Feminists bitched out about it. (It assumes that you are what you are, you’re born what you are, and you can’t change anything.) o There’s always a powerful and a submissive o There’s a “pathos of distance’  They’re each getting something:  Support and authority for master, and stability to servant - Legal-Rational Authority o Belief in the legality of enacted rules o Consistent system of abstract rules that have been intentionally established o “A system of consciously made rational rules  There’s a purpose o Relationships seen as membership in an organization  We see each others as equals because we’re all on the “same sinking boat” o Individual right/duties as a member of the organization  We know at the same time what expectations are made of us.  Do not owe obedience to individual but to the impersonal order  They only have authority as far as they are the representatives of those specific organizations.  Members are all equal before the law; economic/social differences leveled. o They may be seen as both sovereign and legal rational, but their purpose is from being rational beings - Rational Legal Authority in Modern Law and Bureaucracy o Set up to be impersonal and abstract so everyone can be represented in and by it.  Not reflecting the identity and the value of people as a group. o The rule of law is the same o This creates stability because all individuals have access to the law, what the punishments might be, it encourages them to abide by the laws. o Bureaucracies rely upon the impersonal relationships.  I.e. when you’re trying to get something done with York, you have to go through all the hoops and your specific circumstances don’t fit into the form.  These forms are intended to make calculations possible by reducing the “human” element, and make it just the bare facts. o Weber sees it as a system always as something that can be turned into a profit.  Business and relationships are conducted in this way. - Charismatic Authority o Devotion to exemplary character of an individual person  Certain quality not accessible to the ordinary person  They might also have a vision  o Authority only legitimate only if followers accept claim/meaning o Seen to have calling which interrupts and challenges  Consider the entrepreneur who is attractive because they want to change the suffering. It’s something they will make that is new is often appealing. This claim alone will make attractive the membership. o Not bound to intellectually analyzable rules (supernatural) o Inherently unstable authority; transcend life of the household and society. o They might only be interested in their own vision, and interested in the followers only as far as they’re useful. o They’re unstable, and there’s nothing that can be followed. - These three types are seen to be ideal types and they don’t necessarily reflect each of the relationships (fitting into one or the other), it might, depending on the different relationships be so. - He was aware that in the empirical reality will be found by mixing different forms. - Evolution of Law/Contracts o Law gradually evolved:  Evolved from a substantively rational system (takes particular circumstances of the individual: who they are, based on a recognition and personal understanding) to a formal rational system (more abstracted, less concerned with who they are, but interested in meeting out justice) o Evolution of contracts  Pre-Modern Society  In primitive was the status conract  Any transaction affected the individual’s entire status  Transactions with outsiders were marked by barter since enforcement
More Less

Related notes for SOSC 2350

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.