Class Notes (837,998)
Canada (510,614)
York University (35,470)
Social Science (3,019)
SOSC 2650 (13)
Anita Lam (13)
Lecture

Labelling theory.docx

9 Pages
64 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Social Science
Course
SOSC 2650
Professor
Anita Lam
Semester
Fall

Description
November 28, 2013 Labeling Theory Lecture Overview 1) Brief recap 2) Labeling theory’s starting premises: social construction and symbolic interactionism 3) Howard Becker: Outsiders 4) Testing labeling theory 5) Policy Implications 1) Recap • Social process theories (social and psychological process) - Social learning: differentialAssociation theory, neutralization theory (what techniques you learn that helps you neutralize your moral values) - Socialization and creating social bonds: social control theory (process of creating social bonds; things that will tie you as an individual to society; assumes people who have attachments or involvements can hold conventional moral policing) - Labeling theory: social process of labeling *are not functionalist because they do not assume that societal idea is not given; any social and moral order is a given achievement*  Societal reaction to crime *Durkheim; whether an act was criminal or not*  Functionalists assume societal consensus us a given and naturally exits *we need crime and it is normal and a necessary feature; everyone agrees on what makes a collective conscious*  Conflict theorists assume that there are social, economic and political inequalities in society. Powerful social groups create and maintain a vision of moral and social order, which is imposed on less powerful social groups • Context of labeling theory: late 1960’s US - State experienced crisis of legitimacy - Government would help eliminate poverty; but the problem was he did not provide people with equal opportunities - Civil rights movements were policed quite brutally by government response. 2) Starting premises of labeling theory • Not cause of crime, but effects of deviant label *why does someone commit crime?**an explanation of what happens to people after they have been labeled a criminal; the effects of labels on a persons’self-image and their past* • It is a theory of deviance as imposed to crime; *all criminal acts are deviance but not all deviant acts are criminal* • Crime(acts that are unlawful) vs. deviance (acts that diverged from the social norms of society) • Recall: positivistic theories are scientific theories that assume a singular reality naturally exists *rejected the spiritualistic ideas of crime in favor of scientific investigation and imperial testing theories* • The reality is a given; assumption that crime naturally exits and criminals exist; this is in the general theory of crime - SomeActs and individuals are inherently criminal Social construction • There are not acts or people that are criminal; except acts and people are criminals because they have been labeled as such; crimes and criminals are socially constructed phenomena; they don’t exist but need to be made. • Crimes and criminals are socially constructed phenomena. They do not simply exist. They are made. • Different people = different realities • Reality is not a natural given. It needs to be constructed - E.g. police coding practices  Over the last 10 years, the san Francisco police department coded allAsians who were arrested as Chinese  Coding similarly to the labeling process; given a force that has implications down the road; has consequences and justify targeting on Chinese persons’, even though they do not follow this category  Coding works because the police perceive you as Chinese orAsian • There is no single, objective reality. Reality is a matter of perspective *when we’re talking about social constructions, we are talking about it changing over time* • What is criminal changes as the social context changes E.G. Crack Cocaine • 1980’s US: “crack epidemic and crack “babies” • Mother could pass on the crack that she uses to her children; this is her deviant behavior passed on to her children. • The only the people are deviant because they have been constructed by the media. • Represented by the media • Crack cocaine was constructed as highly dangerous & highly addicted drug* • American Federal Sentencing Guidelines (1986) • Crack would induce people to violence behavior - Crack cocaine: powder cocaine = 100:1 ratio *will determine the sentence that you will receive if you were convicted of the sell or possession of cocaine; you only need 1gram of crack cocaine to trigger the 5 year mandatory sentencing; in contrast the 5 year sentence would be 100 grams of powder cocaine* - 5 year mandatory sentence - What is the problem? Both crack cocaine and powder cocaine trigger the same side effect and are similar; the idea of the crack baby is disproportionate because crack addicted mothers don’t have crack born babies and they don’t end up having withdrawal symptoms Symbolic Interactionism • Holds that people communicate through symbols (e.g. gestures, signs, words, or images that represent something else) • People interpret symbolic gestures from other people and incorporate them into their own self-image *symbolic interactions = people communicate through symbols that stem for something else and people will interpret these symbolic interactions; this has a consequences because we interpret these gestures in our own self-image* • Reality is dependent on a person’s subjective interpretation of symbolic interactions. Their interpretation shapes future behavior. • Symbolic labels - Master status: deviant label comes to redefine the whole person.A social status that comes to primarily identify an individual and supersedes all other status positions • Labeling can lead to and help sustain chronic offending • When you see someone who is disabled you think of them as dangerous and crazy; and this is similar to a criminal • Start acting towards you based on your label; because of this situation; label theorist argue that it makes it harder for a criminal to conform and might push that person into a criminal career • Can occur in different scenarios 1) criminal records= criminal label; because the person can’t find legitimate employment he/she might find illegitimate means to make money = puts us on a path of strain theory,.2 ) this criminal behavior is damaging to our relationships; being excluded and you are left to bond with anti-social deviant behaviors = differential association theory. 3) labeling theory; after being labeled as criminal the offender might no longer see themselves as law-abiding people but rather criminals because they start internalizing the public’s perceptions Self-Concept • Looking-glass self: we see ourselves through the eyes of other people and incorporate their views into our self-concept *seeing ourselves through the eyes of other people is crucial for us; in those interactions those other people act like a mirror and they reflect back onto us a sense of who we are* 3) Howard Becker: Outsiders • The outsider is someone who deviates from group rules *deviance is not a disease or pathological behavior; - This person is not pathological • different from Lombroso; it is socially constructed and does not exist in someone; what it is according to beccer is the consequences of rules and sanctions to an individual’s by owners* • Social constru
More Less

Related notes for SOSC 2650

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit