Class Notes (839,590)
Canada (511,419)
York University (35,597)
Social Science (3,019)
SOSC 2652 (37)
Anna Pratt (32)
Lecture

Why punish- jan 31- 2013.docx

4 Pages
121 Views

Department
Social Science
Course Code
SOSC 2652
Professor
Anna Pratt

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 4 pages of the document.
Description
Why punish? - How we approach and understand sentencing has a lot to do with what we think of the criminal justice system - Whether we think or it as a funnel or net - Over incarceration in Canada and the prison punishment nexus: - Sentencing is an area that has the least support in popular opinion - Most Canada believes sentences are too linent, this underestimates the severity of sentences that are handed down by the Canadian court. - Over reliance on prisons are punishment speaks to prison punishment nexus what means there is a taken for granted thinking the prison are the primary sanctions for first resort - Nexus is incredible resilient, people have questioned the high cost of prisons and the ineffectiveness of prisons - Yet we continue to have this connection - When we think of punishment we think of prisons - Canada remains top five nations for incarceration - Canada really isn’t very linent, when it comes to incarceration - Yet people still think we need to be tougher, one of the reasons why is because the politics of crime control - This is fuelled by offenders who reoffend on parole or bail - The reason why those storys are news worthy are because they expections most people not reoffend - Sentencing is one of the more media friendly part of the criminal justice process - Even trails are not interesting for journalist - Sentencing aspect of the process is particularly media friendly - Sentencing is a complex stage, Canadian may be correct in a sense that there is a lack of consistency and complexicty in sentencing - Judges have a huge amount of discretion - Sentencing must be legal and done by a judge - CCC sets max and min sentences - In a great majority of cases judges rely on their own judgement - They may draw from their expeoricne, converstion with other judges, their own beliefs - It falls largely to their discreation - Sentencing process - Nature and duration of punishment is done at the sentencing stage - 3 main questions - In and out deicison- community base sentence of cusotidal - Type of sanction- - Quantum of sanction - 2 ohaes - Justifying punishment- why punish ? - Choosing of the sanction- what kind of sentence fulfills the ration - Purpose of sentencing - Last two give expression to restorative aims - 718.1- proportionality of a sentencing is dervide by the gravity of offence or the degree to which the offender is responsible of the crime - 781.2- migrating and aggrativing circumstances, whether it was relating to hate for a race - Includes sentences should be the least restrictive and prison should be the last resort - Incarceration is suppose to be the last resort - Rationales of sentencing - Backward-looking: (retributive) – eye for an eye- focus on getting back at the person for the crime they have committed in the past. Punishment does not care of think about the future consequences - Entire focus is not the past and not on the offender but offense that took place in the past - Offender is blame worthy, and that the punishment should fit the crime - It does not mean get tougher and have harder punishment - It was actually a call for moderate punishment (no more than a eye for an eye) - Concept that embodies a concern to limit and make the punishment porpotinate - Denunciation, punishment is an expression of society disapproval of the crime that occurred at the time - Also entails the idea that you can have exemplary sentences (a harsh sentence) - Forward looking: restorative justice, idea that the hope is to rehabilitate the offender so that person does not offend in the future. Deterrence’s, punishment is justified because it will prevent a crime in the future by deterring the same individuals or other - Key is main focus is not on the crime committed in the past but what can occur and to prevent crime from occurring in the future - R.V (JJ) - Looked at prior offence- backward looking - General deterrence- forward looking - Fit sentence- backward looking/forward looking - Needs and requirement of young offenders- forward looking (rehabilitation) - Community service options- forward- looking (rehab) - Open custody- forward looking (rehabilitating young offender) - Rationales review: tradition rationales - Retribution and denunciations- guided by the principle of dessert meaning that if you are going to punish retribution its because the defended deserve its- punshiment should fit the crime - Focuses solely on the past offence, no foucs on preventing crime, rehabilitating the offenders - If you were to follow this to its extreme, you would have many pre determined sentences for set crime. - Little discreation
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit