Class Notes (904,915)
CA (538,335)
York (38,195)
THEA (134)
THEA 1900 (7)
Lecture 1

THEA 1900 Lecture 1: The diasporic Imagination and Theatre (online)en

7 Pages
106 Views

Department
Theatre
Course Code
THEA 1900
Professor
Alberto Guevara

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 7 pages of the document.

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
            THE  DIASPORIC  IMAGINATION  AND  THEATRE  (0nline)       In Walter Benjamin’s account, ‘memory creates the chain of tradition which passes a happening on from generation to generation,’ and the storyteller ‘tells from experience—her own or that reported by others. And she in turn makes it the experience of those who are listening to her tale’” (in Fisher 2001: 227). This online lecture deals with the notion of diasporic communities. Many contemporary cities in North America, including the city of Toronto, and to some extent in Europe, are increasingly home to what has been called diasporic communities: immigrants, expatriates, refugees, guest workers, and exile communities. This diasporic reality has changed the definition of nation, citizen, and subject. The “primordial” categories and boundaries of ethnicity, race, religion and territories have been transformed by the movements of people across nations’ boundaries and also due to the fact that the speed of communication and information has become widespread around the world. The ever-increasing political presence of refugees and immigrants in post-Cold war Europe and North America has generated considerable debate about the nature of multicultural societies. It is argued that the world is now producing a different type of a subject, a different type of citizen, and a new type of nation state. Reflecting this new reality scholars and artists working on the area of diasporas had to rethink the notions of ethnicity and identity and cultural boundaries. This new citizen is more characterized by its multiple and complicated identities. The city of Toronto is considered one of the most multicultural cities in the world: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQaNvY7jI3I The demand for the recognition of cultural, racial, and ethnic differences has come to occupy a central place in political governments to reflect this new reality. As social anthropologists James Clifford put it in his article called “Diasporas” (1994), bounded communities or homogenous communities are difficult to find nowadays. What does it mean to be African-American, Japanese–Canadian, Hispanic American or Hindo-Canadian or Irish Canadian? What side of the hyphen takes precedence? The answers to these questions are connected to the notion of a diasporic imagination and of a social/cultural identity. We can think of a diasporic imagination as a type of collective identity or a cultural (social) memory defined by a vision or myth of a homeland, or a place of origin. What this mean is that the main characteristic of a diasporic community is maintaining a “memory”, a vision or myth about a place, a homeland. According to a common definition, social identity “is the portion of an individual's self-concept derived from perceived membership in a relevant social group” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_identity_theory). The context of a diasporic imagination is then one of forced or voluntary relocation: it is about displacement, exile and immigration. It is about constructing a new type of identity: one that is new and emerging based on the present conditions of the diaspora. This new type of identity is ripe with creative possibilities when it comes to art, theatre, and performance. Theatre and performance scholar Ric Knowles states that, “communities in diaspora interact and constitute themselves as communities through the performative enactment of intercultural memory (2010: 167). 2 An example of the enactment of intercultural memory can be found in theatrical performances such as plays that approach cultural memory and perform diasporic memory as a bridge across two or more cultures. In Toronto, various kinds of this theatrical practice exists such as Fish Eyes (Anita Majundar), Singkil (Catherine Hernandez Filipino), the Sheep and the Whale (by Ahmed Ghazali and the scrubbing project by turtle Gals). Knowles nonetheless proposes that there is a difference between government-sanctioned multiculturalism - what he calls Multicultural Text - and artistic expressions that enact intercultural memory - what he calls Intercultural Performance. “Multicultural texts are the policies, docu- ments, and official discourses of Canadian multiculturalism, as well as the theatrical events and social performances, often funded by government diversity programs and framed by civic heritage spectacles, that are sanctioned by those texts” (Knowles 3-4). On the other hand, “Intercultural” performance work is made by a host of primarily young artists of color, and seeks to disrupt, reinterpret, question, and challenge the myths of “mosaic” harmony …” (Knowles 4) There are pitfalls with Multicultural Text or official multiculturalism. This type of government-sponsored politics can be seen as a way of managing and controlling difference. Official multiculturalism typically constructs memory in essensialistic, static and nostalgic ways separating communities rather than uniting them. 3 Official multiculturalism is about heritage; it is about celebrating Canada as an immigrant nation or a haven for refugees, and so on. Such politics, to some degree, are controlled through granting agencies. Official multiculturalism is about is fixed identities.
More Less
Unlock Document


Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit