WRTG-101 Lecture 21: Clark v. Arizona

64 views1 pages

Document Summary

Eric clark shot and killed a police officer during a traffic stop. At trial in arizona state court, clark, a diagnosed paranoid schizophrenic who believed his. The trial judge, however, ruled that arizona law confined the use of the expert evidence to his insanity claim and did not permit him to use it to show he could not form the necessary criminal intent. The court ruled that he had not sufficiently proved his insanity defense, and clark was. The arizona court of appeals affirmed. convicted and sentenced to 25 years to life in prison. In a 5-to-4 decision by justice david souter, the supreme court held that arizona could constitutionally limit the use of expert evidence about a defendant"s mental state to his insanity defense. "clark presses no objection to arizona"s decision to require persuasion to a clear and convincing degree before the presumption of sanity and normal responsibility," justice souter wrote.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents

Related Questions