PHIL 320 Lecture 8: The Three Criteria of Cogency

91 views1 pages

Document Summary

Note: an argument can be valid but not cogent. if an argument is cogent it must be valid. Validity has to do with the relationship between the premises and the conclusion , while truth has to do with the relationship between premises and the world. An argument is valid when the premises provide support for the conclusion. Conclusive support- if the premises are true, then conclusion can"t be false. If argument offers conclusive support, the argument is deductively valid, if. Strong probable support-attempts to make conclusion more likely. If argument succeeds in probable support it is valid. if not, it is invalid. not it is deductively invalid.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents