ECON1151 Lecture : Case Study #3.docx
22 Jan 2014
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Before taking the drug pharmamorin to help the chronic distrust of bc housing, on average, the students had a rating of 79. 8. After they took the drug, the average was boosted by roughly to 81. 3. Therefore, the drug had about a two-point effect on the rating given by a sample of bc students. Essentially, there is a small statistical difference between the two groups. According to the data, according to the individual, there is a . 9 correlation that means that on average, the increase from before and after individually was only . 9, which shows a small change. Basically, the range in change from individual to group is . 9-1. 7. This follows that an increase of roughly 1 rating point occurred after the drug was used. This means that the drug did not have such a significant difference on the group or the individual. The students still did not trust the bc housing system.
