PHIL4406 Lecture : Locke's Proof of God.docx
Document Summary
If you can understand/answer any of the below ramblings i would greatly appreciate it! 1: man exists. (1, definition of the word know", something cannot come from nothing. (experience) 4: man comes from something else. (2, 4) If a thing exists then it comes from something else. (conditional of 3) We cannot feel their hunger or other pains. We could easily correct this by putting it in terms of ourselves (i know that i exist ect) but i feel like that might screw up the justifications for 6. To me, it sounds too childish to be considered a good objection but i cannot think of a better way to phrase it. In class, this was one of the first objections raised (at least that is what i wrote in my notes) but when i went back to try and re-model/re-create it, it came out like this. Am i missing a justification: a man knows that he exists. (experience)