Class Notes (838,584)
United States (325,482)
Boston College (3,571)
POLI 2327 (25)
All (25)
Lecture

Complete Lecture 23 Notes

5 Pages
101 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POLI 2327
Professor
All Professors
Semester
Fall

Description
11/21/13 Lecture 23 • Felix frankfurter believed himself to be protector of civil liberties o Believed it was the place of the courts to be divergent to the democratic majorities  Never changed that view o Notorious for his Flag Salute Cases from the late 30s and early 40s  Involve Jehovah’s Witnesses • Law required that all students in public school salute the flag o Some JW students didn’t salute the flag and were expelled from school  Didn’t salute the flag because it was against their religion • Court upheld their expulsion from school • Frankfurter = not his place as a judge to place his own personal views in place of the legislature o State/legislature should and is in control of repealing the law, not him o West Virginia v. Barnett – court overrules this opinion  Majority opinion written by Robert Jackson • Said that the role of the court is to protect minorities against powerful majorities who violate their rights • Conservatives are condemning judicial activism o Frankfurter voted with them a lot of times but was also the voice for judicial restraint  Progressive in a liberal era • Supreme Court is a moving target and different relations of institutional power are constantly shifting • Plessy v. Ferguson o desgregation o Justice Harlan  Dissented saying that this is true despite the fact that the white race itself is the dominant race in the USA in education, wealth, power • Doesn’t doubt that it will continue that way for a long time o Firm believer in white supremacy o Others Saw it as a liberty right  Whether people are inferior, superior, they have an equal right to liberty o Famous doctrine of separate but equal  Each race is put in its own place and is equally separated • Prism of the Supreme Court’s Agenda o Agenda of supreme court switches entirely in early 20 century  After franklin Roosevelt, started taking many cases about civil liberties and civil rights • Court suddenly starts to care a lot about civil rights • What would change a court agenda in that way? o Lobbying?  Lobbying means that you’re in the halls of the congress trying to make them vote a certain way • Appointing people with new views  Civil rights was not on FDR’s agenda • Wasn’t trying to vote in pro-civil rights judges  Amicus Ciraie • Supreme court in the 19 century – would only hear argument of plaintiff and defendant o Then started to let people submit amicus briefs – people who would be affected by case but aren’t involved directly with case  Now courts see themselves as doing public policy  After WWII, nothing says that a democracy is better than communism if our population is not equal. Also, racism is too similar to what happened with Holocaust • In a war against communism o Communism is committed to equality while the United S
More Less

Related notes for POLI 2327

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit