IAFS 3000 Lecture Notes - Lecture 20: Nuclear Material, Advisory Opinion, Nuclear Proliferation
21 Dec 2016
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Use of force against states that might have wmds. Essay also argues that since the legal morality surrounding wmd prevention is so untested and very hazy (since no one ever toes the line) the legal framework surrounding the situation must be sound. The next big question isn"t like the quotes at the beginning of the article by thatcher or. Its just too hard with intel and proliferation plus people lying about what they have to be sure anymore: many things that are used in wmds are used in everyday purposes too. Unilateralist view attack are identifiable. : think bush admin in 2002, realist thinking, 3. Not to mention legitimacy concerns (who determines the right to pull the preemptive trigger?: reasonable necessity: addresses aggression with waiting for response via law by being as transparent as possible while also having a backup of.
