CRIM 424 Lecture Notes - Lecture 11: Custodial Interrogation, Ant-Zen

42 views4 pages

Document Summary

Miranda v. arizona (1966: supreme court determined that the atmosphere of custodial interrogation is so inherently coercive that law enforcement must advise the subject of certain rights before engaging in interrogation, custody + interrogation = warnings + waiver. Custody for purposes of miranda: age will inform whether custody exists, what is not custody, temporary (or investigative) detention the terry stop, consensual encounter, is simply being in prison serving a sentence custody , howes v. fields (2012) Miranda- admitted to a murder to higher investigation while talking to a cellmate who used to be an informant. Informant seeks out his handler for less time in jail; leo keeps the informant and sends in a new uca, and implicating himself for the murder to the uca: public safety questions (new york v. quarles, 1984) Invoking a right: by refusing to waive the rights when advised of the rights.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents