AJ 4 Lecture 19: AJ 4 - Criminal Law - 19

0 views2 pages
Jeff Koo
AJ 4
Criminal Law
Fall 2018
4 Units
Accomplice Liability
Elements
Modern Categories;
Accessory before the fact = aided/counseled in commission of crime, but was not
there;
Accessory after the fact = knows of principal’s guilt and helps him avoid getting
caught;
Generally, accessories can only be charged in the jurisdiction where they acted,
not where crime occurred (if they are different); today, this charge is usually
“hindering prosecution” – a lesser offense;
Derivative Liability secondary/accomplice liability is derivative it is by virtue of
contributing to the primary actor’s conduct that the liability arises; a relationship between
the two is insufficient; the secondary person has to actually do something;
Cases:
State v. Ward, 1978 (33) see elements above;
State v. Hoselton, 1988 (34) D is convicted as an accomplice even though he
didn’t know his friends were going to break into a storage unit; state pegs him as a
lookout because he did not do anything to stop the crime, but court finds this is
insufficient evidence that he shared same specific intent to commit a crime as the
other defendants;
Riley v. State, 2002 (34) 2Ds convicted on accomplice theory for firing into
crowd, even though it was impossible to decide who was the principal and who
was the accomplice;
Court notes that many illogical conclusions can be reached if accomplice
liability is so narrowly interpreted; adopts MPC view that accomplice
mental state is to be interpreted separately from any other defendant’s
mental state;
State v. Linscott, 1987 (34) D agrees to rob another with co-Ds, but is convicted
for murder when it goes wrong; Court upholds conviction on basis that knowingly
promoting a primary crime” (here, robbery) is sufficient to transfer liability for a
secondary crime (here, murder);
Criminal Defenses
Chart: List of Defenses;
Failure of proof = negate an element of the crime;
Offense modification = concede all elements are present, but
contend that actor has not caused the harm intended to be
prevented by the statute;
Justification = harm is outweighed by the need to avoid a greater
harm or to further an important societal interest;
Unlock document

This preview shows half of the first page of the document.
Unlock all 2 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get OneClass Notes+

Unlimited access to class notes and textbook notes.

YearlyBest Value
75% OFF
$8 USD/m
Monthly
$30 USD/m
You will be charged $96 USD upfront and auto renewed at the end of each cycle. You may cancel anytime under Payment Settings. For more information, see our Terms and Privacy.
Payments are encrypted using 256-bit SSL. Powered by Stripe.