Class Notes (1,020,209)
US (399,181)
NU (4,567)
CLTR (32)
Lecture 3

CLTR 1501 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Service Du Travail Obligatoire, Maurice Papon, University Of Paris

7 pages36 viewsSpring 2016

Department
Culture
Course Code
CLTR 1501
Professor
Alice L.Sedar
Lecture
3

This preview shows pages 1-2. to view the full 7 pages of the document.
Youth in France
1. 2011 survey by Fonapol -> Sciences Pô about teenagers’ aspirations and
their dreams
Tangles many issues (taxes, immigration, sexuality)
Those who opposed: 16-29 years old
What is a good life for the French?
oStarting a family (significantly more important in France than
rest of Europe) 47%
oEarning a lot of money = 14%
oFeeling free = 18%
In France education is practically free compared to
America
Americans focus more on earning a lot of money
What does our generation hope to achieve in the next 15 years?
oWant to own a house or a flat = 68% (world record)
Relates back to wanting a family and wanting to own
real estate
oHaving children
Relates back to the importance of family
oWill teach their children to be independent = 12%
Relating back to obedience
Obedient at home but disobedient outside in cases of
social justice
oIt’s acceptable to break the law to fight for justice in society =
57%
oAgainst wearing religious symbols at work = 71%
oFamily first, nationality second
French youth is among the most pessimistic
Half against & half for globalization
oHalf think it’s an opportunity and half think it’s doomsdays
oThose who think it’s an opportunity, that average is much
lower compared to all of Europe
oThe less qualified you are, the older you get, and when it
relates to our globalization, the more you are against
globalization
Against it because they’re not prepared (public
schools)
2. Summary of the educational system in France (high school and college)
1830s: boys had to go to school so that they can learn manners
and rules, etc.
1880s: young girls could now go to high school but didn’t have the
same curriculum as the boys until 1923
The main focus in high school until WWII was humanities because
the intellect was important
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Only half of the first page are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

oProblem: it was the children whose parents had the means
and therefore could go to college afterwards and get a job
via parents’ connections
oBut those who were not as lucky didn’t have anything to do
with their high school diploma
After WWII, when communists came into power, there was a will to
get more people from diverse backgrounds into the system to
democratize the system; did this for 3 reasons:
oSwitched the curriculum from humanities to maths and
sciences
Believed it would open the gate to more students
Many intellectuals, writers, politicians discredited
themselves due to the Vichy government
Democratize the education and to train scientists
because they wanted to modernize France
The Cold War; Russia was going full blast with
scientific developments therefore France wanted to
provide the country with people who could also
defend the country using technology
Despite these things, in 1964, Pierre Bourdieu
said that “only 1% of young people coming
from modest backgrounds got to higher
education (BAC)” therefore the system has
failed
Mid 80s: François Mitterrand realized that the BAC was not enough
for all students therefore went from only having 5 different types to
25 types
oBelieved that opening up the number of different BACs for
students would enable the students to choose something
they can succeed in so that they be able to go to college
oThey wanted at least 80% of high school students to pass
with the BAC
oPublic educational schools’ teachers were not prepared to
teach students in such diverse backgrounds
oUniversities were suddenly flooded with students and the
means of the university put a strain on the professors,
students, etc.
oProfessors who were teaching in higher education in public
universities continued to teach as if they had a minority of
elite students
Result: only 40% of people graduated because most
of them dropped out
The way they were taught was completely
disconnected from reality
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version


Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.