THEATRE 2100 Lecture Notes - Lecture 8: Kassidy, Sleeveless Shirt, Rape Culture

40 views4 pages

burgundyclam437

30 Oct 2017

School

Ohio State University

Department

Theatre

Course

THEATRE 2100

Professor

Linnea Bond

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

I walked into the performance surrounded by black, on the ceiling and the floors. The stage was surrounded by audience on three sides as if we were apart of the play too. Intimacy flourished as the actors spoke around the room, as if each of them were speaking directly to me. The play had a feel of a one-sided conversation, but in a positive way. The actors were just telling a story in the best way they knew how with a very heavy, tough subject. Laughter grasped to the comedic relief as a way to interpret the more difficult subject. Although i had read the play, it still surprised me how much i laughed and how entertained i was by the characters and the story. I mean, it is a play, which is created to entertain, but, i felt almost odd to perceive the play so well and to find so much joy in a story about rape.

Related Questions

Read or listen to Morals in Business: Walter Pavlo Share your thoughts and opinions regarding this real life situation. Be sure to include your ideas about what businesses can do to avoid similar problems.

https://spotlightenglish.com/listen/morals-in-business-walter-pavlo

Transcript Voice 1 Hello. Iâm Marina Santee. Voice 2 And Iâm Ruby Jones. Welcome to Spotlight. This programme uses a special English method of broadcasting. It is easier for people to understand, no matter where in the world they live. Voice 1 Would you consider stealing six million [6,000,000] dollars from a company, if you had the chance? Most people would immediately answer ânoâ to this question. The majority of people consider themselves to be good, honest citizens. Walter Pavlo used to describe himself like this. Walter was a young, successful business man. He studied hard. And he worked hard. In time, he got a good job at an international communications company called MCI. MCI managed billions of dollars each year. Walterâs office was a highly pressured working environment. Walter worked hard to meet targets and goals. If someone had asked him back then - would he steal six million dollars from the company? He would have answered, âNo way!â Yet only a few years later, Walter went to prison for stealing money from MCI. What made this good man turn to crime? Here is his story. Voice 2 Walter Pavlo was born into a good family. His parents taught him Christian values. He said; Voice 3 âI was taught, âdo not stealâ; âdo not cheatâ; âbe honestâ; âbe truthful in everything that you do.â Voice 2 Walter held these values for a long time. However, slowly, other values in the business world began to influence him. At the age of thirty-two, Walter was a senior manager at MCI. He managed millions of dollars. His job was very pressured - and difficult. Then, for the first time in his life, it looked like Walter would not meet his targets. He had to do something. He asked a co-worker for advice. His friend told Walter to cheat a little. He told him that everyone else was doing it. It was normal. Voice 1 Pavlo looked around him. It seemed that his friend was right. The world of business was full of successful cheats. Maybe a little dishonesty was not so bad. In his mind, Walter rationalised cheating. He made it seem reasonable. Voice 2 Pavlo learned how to hide customersâ debts. He made small changes in the companyâs financial books to make them look better. This meant that Walter kept his good record of achievement. And it meant that the companyâs records looked good to investors. Voice 1 However, this led Walter to a bigger temptation. Why not use the same method of dishonesty to enrich himself? Again, Walter rationalised his plan. He said later; Voice 3 âTo me it looked like everyone was cheating. And I joined in. It did not seem that bad. Customers were getting richer. And I wanted my share.â Voice 2 Something else was happening inside Walter. He was becoming hostile in his heart. All around him were lies and cheats. He saw that people only cared about themselves. He saw the company and customers making themselves richer. He said, Voice 3 âI hated the customers. I hated the company. And then, I hated myself. Then, nothing mattered anymore.â Voice 1 And so, Walter set up a secret bank account in the Cayman Islands. Customers with debts paid money directly into this bank account. Then, Walter made their debt disappear on MCIâs records. Over a six month period, Walter and a co-worker took six million dollars! Voice 2 However, as time passed, Walter became afraid. He lived in fear of getting caught and arrested. The lies and secrets created much pressure. Walter said he became emotionally unbalanced. He came to believe that he would surely be caught - it was only a question of when. Voice 1 After a few months, MCI noticed a series of payments going into a Cayman bank account. They questioned Walter about it. Walter remembers; Voice 3 âI just said I did not want to talk about it. In a way I could not avoid uncovering my secret, because I was no longer able to hide what I was doing.â Voice 1 Walter resigned from MCI. He hoped that the investigations would stop. But they did not. MCI called in the police. Voice 2 Pavlo admitted his crime. His punishment was a prison sentence of three years and five months. He would also have to sacrifice some of his future earnings - over the next twenty-seven [27] years. Voice 1 In prison, Pavlo learned a lot about himself. He looked at the process that resulted in such severe crime. He said; Voice 3 âI do not think of myself as a bad person. For me to do something bad, or illegal, I have to make myself believe it is not bad. I rationalised, reasoned, what I was doing. I did this so much that I became far removed from reality. I told myself things like - everyone else is doing it, I need to get by, my family deserves this - and so on. This is what happens to a lot of people. They will rationalise in order to do something wrong.â Voice 2 Walter finished serving his difficult sentence in 2003. Life outside of prison was not to be easy either. His wife had divorced him. His friends had disappeared. No one wanted to employ the man who had stolen millions. However, people did want to hear about it. Voice 1 Many businesses saw the power of telling such a story. It could prevent their employees making the same mistake. Business schools and universities wanted their students to hear Walterâs story. Voice 2 And so Walter decided on a new kind of work. Today, he goes into business schools, companies and universities. He tells his story. He warns people of the easy path that leads to crime. He gives this message to business students: Voice 3 âThe chance of you facing a difficult moral decision at some time in your business life is one hundred percent. It will happen. There is no way round it...â âYou will never know what your values are worth until the test. The things that your parents have taught you, the things that you learned in school. What about them? When you are tested, what will you do?â Voice 1 Walter Pavloâs values had not survived this test. However he hopes that his weaknesses may strengthen others. He hopes that his story will strengthen peopleâs values. And then, when they are tested they will not fall. Voice 2 The writer and producer of todayâs programme was Marina Santee. All quotes were adapted for the programme. The voices you heard were from the United Kingdom and the United States. Computer users can hear our programmes, read our scripts and see our word list on our website at http://www.radio.english.net. This programme is called, âMorals in Business: Walter Pavloâ Voice 1 You are welcome to comment or ask about todayâs programme. You can e-mail us at radio @ english . net. Thank you for joining us today. Until next time. Goodbye.

Lambeth Custom Cabinets (B)

Jack Lambeth, a master cabinet maker, owns and operates a shopwhere he sells custom-made cabinets. At the beginning of Septemberhis business had no outstanding debt and the following amounts wereon his books:

1. Raw materials inventory, $3,350.

2. Supplies inventory, $920.

3. Work-in-process inventory, $7,200.

			Overhead
Job	Materials	Labor	(50% of Labor)
A-3	$950	$ 1,300	$650
A-4	1,050	850	425
A-5	625	900	450
Total	$2,625	$3,050	$1,525	$	7,200

4. Cash as of September 1 were $16,890.

During the month, Lambeth's woodworking crew finished jobs A-3,A-4, and A-6 but did not finish A-5. Job A-7 and A-8 was startedbut not finished during September. Overhead costs (pertainingprimarily to equipment and shop depreciation, cleaning supplies,and insurance) are applied to every job at the end of the monthunless the job is finished during the month, in which case overheadis applied when the job is finished.

During September, the followingdirect materials and direct labor costs were incurred:

Job DirectMaterials Labor

A-3 $280 $750

A-4 350 1,300

A-5 180 550

A-6 375 490

A-7 590 370

A-8 900 870

Total $2,675 $4,330

Other financial factors of importance pertaining to Septemberwere:

A. $2,675 of raw materials werepurchased during the month.

B. Supplies of $780 were purchasedwhile $590 were used and thus transferred to the manufacturingoverhead account.

C. Total increases to the laborgeneral ledger account were $6,850. (Apparently there was $2,520indirect labor charged.)

D. General and administrative expenses for the month were$3,420.

E. Collections received from customers on jobs A-3, A-4, and A-6amounted to $7,125, $10,600, and $2,750, respectively, for a totalof $20,475.

F. At the end of the month, Lambeth Custom Cabinets had nooutstanding debts.

While Jack was reviewing theSeptember data he became very concerned about the manufacturingoverhead variance (MOV). Since Jack never wanted to lay off anemployee, the MOV was always large in months when business wasslow. (Jack assigned unoccupied workers to general clean-up andrepair worl< and charged their wages to indirect labor.) Ofcourse, Lambeth realized why the MOV was so large. What he worriedabout, however, was Mrs. Carter.

Mrs. Carter, a neighbor, hadstopped in the shop one day in early September to get a price onsome cabinets she wanted built. Jack's son, Jack Jr., spoke withher. Jack Jr. was working in the shop while on summer vacationbetween his first and second year of graduate business school. JackJr. studied the plans that Mrs. Carter had and estimated the costto build her cabinets at $2,050. His job estimation sheetshowed:

Lumber $990

Finishingmaterials 100

Direct laborcost 640

Overhead 320

$2,050

When Jack Jr. quoted a price of$2,560 ($2,050 cost $510 profit) to Mrs. Carter, she said that shecould get the same thing built by Walworth Custom Kitchens for$1,950.

Furthermore, she informed Jack Jr.that, "1 would throw the dumb economics books away before I wouldpay a penny more than $1,950 for book cabinets to store them."

Jack Jr. simply told her that hisbest price would be $2,560. He explained all about labor,materials, profit, overhead, and competitive capitalism. Inaddition, he told Mrs. Carter that Walworth couldn't make money ona $1,950 price and if Walworth was really willing to build theshelves for $1,950 she would be stealing from Mr. Walworth!

Mrs. Carter was very angry when sheleft. Jack Jr. later told his father the whole story and laughed ashe said, "Heck, we can't build stuff that costs $2,050 and sell itat a price of $1,950, let alone $2,000 can we?" At that timeLambeth didn't think much about the incident but he began to wonderwhether Jack Jr. had learned anything at graduate business school.Lambeth became especially concerned when he saw Bob Walworth, whosaid, "Mrs. Carter saved me last month." It seems that Walworth hadjust delivered Mrs. Carter's new cabinets for which she paid$1,950. Jack Lambeth wondered who was right â Jack Jr. orWalworth?

Prepare journal entries for the transaction for September.

Record the beginning balances in the General Ledger. Post theSeptember transaction from #1 into the General Ledger.

Prepare a Balance Sheet and Income Statement for September30^th

Prepare a Variable Costing Income Statement for September30th

Based on what you know about the cost structure of LambethCustom Cabinets, could Lambeth make a profit and/or a positivecontribution margin on Mrs. Carter's order at a selling price of$1,950?

Hint: Use Excel to completerequirements 1-4.

So far I have:

Job Cost

A-3	Materials	Labor	Overhead	Total	Transfer to FG	WIP
Beg. Bal.	950.00	1,300.00	650.00	2,900.00
Sept. Act.	280.00	750.00	375.00	1,405.00
Total	$ 1,230.00	$ 2,050.00	$ 1,025.00	$ 4,305.00	$ 4,305.00

A-4	Materials	Labor	Overhead	Total
Beg. Bal.	1,050.00	850.00	425.00	2,325.00
Sept. Act.	350.00	1,300.00	650.00	2,300.00
Total	$ 1,400.00	$ 2,150.00	$ 1,075.00	$ 4,625.00	$ 4,625.00

A-5	Materials	Labor	Overhead	Total
Beg. Bal.	625.00	900.00	450.00	1,975.00
Sept. Act.	180.00	550.00	275.00	1,005.00
Total	$ 805.00	$ 1,450.00	$ 725.00	$ 2,980.00		$ 2,980.00

A-6	Materials	Labor	Overhead	Total
Beg. Bal.	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -
Sept. Act.	375.00	490.00	245.00	$ 1,110.00
Total	$ 375.00	$ 490.00	$ 245.00	$ 1,110.00	$ 1,110.00

A-7	Materials	Labor	Overhead	Total
Beg. Bal.				$ -
Sept. Act.	590.00	370.00	185.00	1,145.00
Total	$ 590.00	$ 370.00	$ 185.00	$ 1,145.00		$ 1,145.00

A-8	Materials	Labor	Overhead	Total
Beg. Bal.	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -
Sept. Act.	900.00	870.00	435.00	2,205.00
Total	$ 900.00	$ 870.00	$ 435.00	$ 2,205.00		$ 2,205.00

J/E

Date	Act. #	D	C
9/2	103	$ 2,675.00
	100		$ 2,675.00
	Purchase of Raw Materials
9/4	104	$ 780.00
	100		$ 780.00
	Purchase of Supplies
	502	$ 590.00
	104		$ 590.00
	Supplies Used
9/10	110	$ 4,330.00
	502	$ 2,520.00
	100		$ 6,850.00
	Labor Incurred
9/12	501	$ 3,420.00
	100		$ 3,420.00
	Gen. and Admin. Expense
9/15	100	$ 7,125.00
	106		$ 7,125.00
	Collections Received for A-3
	100	$ 10,600.00
	106		$ 10,600.00
	Collections Received for A-4
	100	$ 2,750.00
	106		$ 2,750.00
	Collections Received for A-6

G/L

#100 Cash
	Date	Description	D	C	Balance
	9/1	Beg. Bal.			$ 16,890.00
	9/2	Purchase RM		$ 2,675.00	$ 14,215.00
	9/4	Purchase Supplies		$ 780.00	$ 13,435.00
	9/10	Labor Incurred		$ 6,850.00	$ 6,585.00
	9/12	G&A Exp.		$ 3,420.00	$ 3,165.00
	9/15	Collections Received A-3	$ 7,125.00		$ 10,290.00
	9/15	Collections Received A-4	$ 10,600.00		$ 20,890.00
	9/15	Collections Received A-6	$ 2,750.00		$ 23,640.00
#103 Raw Materials
	9/1	Beg. Bal.			$ 3,350.00
	9/2	Purchase RM	$ 2,675.00		$ 6,025.00
#104 Supplies
	9/1	Beg. Bal.			$ 920.00
	9/4	Purchase Supplies	$ 780.00		$ 1,700.00
	9/4	Supplies Used		$ 590.00	$ 1,110.00
#106 Accounts Receivable
	9/1	Beg. Bal.			$ 20,475.00
	9/15	Collections Received A-3		$ 7,125.00	$ 13,350.00
	9/15	Collections Received A-4		$ 10,600.00	$ 2,750.00
	9/15	Collections Received A-6		$ 2,750.00	$ -
#110 WIP Control
	9/1	Beg. Bal.			$ 7,200.00
	9/10	Labor Incurred	$ 4,330.00		$ 11,530.00
#112 Finished Goods
#401 Sales
#501 Gen. & AdminExp.
	9/12	G&A Exp.	$ 3,420.00		$ 3,420.00
#502 MOH Control
	9/4	Supplies Used	$ 590.00		$ 590.00
	9/10	Labor Incurred	$ 2,520.00		$ 3,110.00
#503 MOH Allocated
#505 CGS

I need to know if what I have is correct so far and where I'mheaded next. Is COGS going to be a debit of 10040? MOH All. creditof 2165?

read the article. and video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MW3ugmGt-9s

By referencing the textbook reading and the video; audio, answer the following questions:

1) Define karyotype.

2) Define Down Syndrome.

3) Describe the challenges addressed in the Perfect video. Compare and contrast to the Herzenberg family.

Only Human is a new podcast from WNYC Studios. Hosted by Mary Harris, Only Human tells stories we all can relate to. Because every body has a story. Subscribe to Only Human on iTunes or wherever you like to get your podcasts.

When Lee Herzenberg remembers the day her son Michael was born, she laughs and calls it a "cool birth." Her obstetrician was a friend, and she describes it almost like a party â "a little bit painful, but that you forget very quickly." Lee even got a kick out of the fact that a resident learned to do an episiotomy on her.

It was November 1961, and she was at the newly christened Palo Alto-Stanford Hospital Center; her husband, Len, was a biology professor on campus. Like most fathers at the time, he didn't attend the birth, which meant he wasn't there when Michael started turning blue.

The nurses whisked the newborn off to the nursery without telling Lee anything was wrong.

It was then that a doctor noticed the characteristic features of Down syndrome: floppy muscles, eyes that slanted upward. They got Michael breathing again, but doctors thought his prognosis was grim. They gave Michael just a few months to live. A daisy chain of physicians was called, and Lee says it was a pediatrics professor who told her husband what had happened. Then Len was dispatched to tell Lee.

She remembers the moment with uncharacteristic emotion. "We hugged each other, and it was a terrible conversation to realize that you'd lost the baby, but the baby was lost," Lee says now. "We knew immediately what we'd do. We had already made the decision that it was not a good thing to take the baby home, and so we didn't."

In the 1960s â an era before neurodiversity movements and early intervention programs â many people still called people with Down syndrome "mongoloids." Playwright Arthur Miller institutionalized his son, Daniel, in 1966. A few years later, an article in The Atlantic Monthly argued that "a Down's is not a person."

Lee and Len Herzenberg had seen friends struggle with the birth of a child with Down syndrome and had even gone with a colleague to an institution, where he dropped off his own infant daughter.

So, they decided Michael would never come home.

But Michael wasn't absolutely lost to them. Michael's birth sparked their search for a blood test that has revolutionized prenatal care in this country.

I made the mistake of telling one scientist I was reporting about "Len Herzenberg's lab." He corrected me instantly: "Len and Lee's lab." Because Lee Herzenberg was "leaning in" decades before Sheryl Sandberg coined the phrase. At 81, Lee, a professor of genetics, is still running the lab she and her husband founded more than 50 years ago. Len died in 2013.

The lab is a quirky place, even by Stanford standards. Lee rarely sits on chairs, preferring cushions on the floor. She's often accompanied by her bichon frise, Gigi. Researchers can often be found working in this basement office well into the night.

But Lee Herzenberg isn't just quirky. She is one of the few professors at Stanford â possibly the only one â never to have officially graduated from college. Instead, she trained by her husband's side, auditing courses while he got his Ph.D. at Caltech (women weren't allowed to attend at the time) and working at his labs at the Pasteur Institute in Paris and the National Institutes of Health.

And the science that's been done here has changed the course of medicine.

The Herzenbergs are best known as the creators of the modern-day fluorescence-activated flow cytometer, or FACS. It was a machine born out of frustration: Len couldn't stand squinting down a microscope looking at cells.

Before the FACS, a biologist peering at slides could feel like he was playing a really intense round of "Where's Waldo," staring at crowds of all kinds of cells, trying to pinpoint the exact ones he was looking for. Not only was it annoying â Len Herzenberg worried it wasn't particularly scientific. He wanted a way to find and describe cells that didn't rely on his worn-out eyes.

The FACS allows you to pour cells in, program the machine to find whatever it is you're looking for, and then it will spit out a little tube of just those cells alone. And the FACS gives you all kinds of information, too: how big the cells are and how much DNA they have inside.

The FACS was used to diagnose AIDS because the technology can quickly and easily sort out T cells. The FACS was used to find the first stem cells. When Len Herzenberg died, one colleague told The New York Times that "without Len, tens of thousands of people now alive would not be."

But in the 1970s, the Herzenbergs were still proving the value of this machine. That's when they started thinking about using it to create a blood test for Down syndrome.

Len had seen research from Finland claiming it was possible to see a fetus's cells in a mother's blood. It was hard to believe. But he figured that FACS, with its nearly magical sorting capabilities, could figure it out. So he took on a medical student named Diana Bianchi as a research associate and made sorting out these cells her project.

If they could isolate these cells, he could learn a lot about the developing fetus, including whether the fetus had chromosomal abnormalities.

"They had a very personal reason for doing this, because of their son Michael," Bianchi says now. "They wanted to have a test that could be offered to any pregnant woman â that would be noninvasive and would allow them to know if a child had Down syndrome. The first step, however, was to show that you could pull out fetal cells."

Scientists now estimate that for every 200 billion cells in a mother's bloodstream, about 10 of those are fetal cells. Bianchi was one of the first people to see them.

The New York Times quoted Len saying the work was a "first step" toward a blood test for Down syndrome for all pregnant women. But it would take 30 years for a practical test to become a reality.

As it turned out, Len's FACS wasn't the right tool for prenatal diagnosis. There weren't very many fetal cells to be sorted, and if a pregnant woman already had children, scientists couldn't be sure if the cells in her blood came from the current fetus or one of her older kids.

But in 2008, Len helped ensure the right tool was found.

A researcher named Stephen Quake had discovered a way to sequence chunks of fetal DNA floating in expectant mothers' blood. As a member of the National Academy of Sciences, Len made sure the paper was published in the academy's journal. Another researcher, Dennis Lo, confirmed Quake's findings. Three years later, the tests were on the market.

Now, at just 10 weeks into a pregnancy, a whole range of things can be revealed with this test. Not just Down syndrome, but a host of other chromosomal abnormalities as well as the sex of the child to be.

Until this test, doctors had to rely on amniocentesis, an invasive procedure that involves inserting a needle in the womb to sample amniotic fluid, or biopsying the placenta, to tell them with any reliability whether a fetus had a chromosomal abnormality. These tests aren't just uncomfortable; they come with a risk of miscarriage. By some estimates, in the past five years the number of these procedures performed in this country has plummeted by more than 50 percent.

To some parents, this knowledge can be alarming. Advocates in Ohio are trying to pass a law preventing abortions if Down syndrome is the reason (North Dakota and Indianahave already passed similar laws).

Lee Herzenberg is honest about what she would have done if she'd known early on in her pregnancy that Michael had Down syndrome.

"I'd say if I had the choice of not pushing Michael into this life â if I at that time would know I was carrying a Down syndrome child â I would have aborted the child," she says. "I see no reason Michael has to live the life he leads. The fact that we've made it very happy for him or that he's made it very happy for us â all of that is adapting to a situation, but I don't think it's fair or proper."

But Lee is alarmed that these tests are now being used to determine the sex of unborn babies. She worries about parents choosing to abort girls.

Diana Bianchi, that medical student from the Herzenberg lab, is now a professor at Tufts, where she founded the Mother Infant Research Institute. She's still working in prenatal testing. In fact, perfecting these tests has become her life's work.

But her focus has shifted. Now that she can detect Down syndrome so early, she wants to treat it early, too â in the womb. Because finding this chromosomal abnormality at 10 weeks means there's a window of opportunity: The brain changes associated with Down syndrome don't occur until a month or so later. Theoretically, you could treat a fetus before some brain changes occur at all.

Bianchi's work is still early. She's experimenting with mice, giving them existing drugs in utero to see if she can forestall brain damage.

There's an often-quoted statistic, that 90 percent of parents who find out that their fetus has Down syndrome will abort. But that statistic is from a study done in the United Kingdom. In the U.S., far fewer women terminate.

"We have to unpack this connection between prenatal testing and abortion," she says. "We have good data to suggest that approximately 40 plus percent of women who know their fetus has Down syndrome continue their pregnancy. There are many women who speak very highly of the fact that this allows them to prepare."

The Down syndrome baby who kicked off the search for this blood test is now a 54-year-old man. He lives in a squat house in Redwood City, Calif., just a 30-minute drive from his birth mother's home.

For years, Michael lived with a local woman named Barbara Jennings, who raised a number of children with developmental challenges. The Herzenbergs' pediatrician helped them find her when Michael was a newborn. The Herzenbergs would visit Michael every month or so, but they never felt they should bring him home. When Barbara died, Michael moved to this group home.

It's hard to know how much Michael understands when I speak to him, though he has learned to read and use a cellphone. And he's stubborn. A lot like his mother, actually. "Michael has the hardest head in the whole world," says Janet Thomas, the caretaker who runs this house. "He does whatever he wants to do. He does not care whatever you say. He's going to do whatever it is he wants to do â that's Michael."

I asked Lee if she ever regretted not raising Michael, and she said no. "It was a decision that was selfish, if you like, because we had things we wanted to do. In retrospect, a lot of things would never have gotten done. There would be no FACS had we decided to do this. Because it would have been a very intensive kind of upbringing."

As for Michael, he clearly loves his mother, no matter what she decided. In Michael's room, there are photos on almost every surface, with snapshots of his biological and adopted families. In the corner is a huge poster of his father, celebrating when he won the Kyoto Prize for his contributions to biotechnology. And deep in one album, there's a picture of Len and Lee together. The caption reads: "Michael's Other Mom + Dad."

pearswan961

THEATRE 2100 Lecture Notes - Lecture 8: Kassidy, Sleeveless Shirt, Rape Culture

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

THEATRE 2100 Lecture Notes - Lecture 6: Kassidy, A Forest

THEATRE 2100 Lecture Notes - Lecture 26: Kassidy, Microsoft Powerpoint

THEATRE 2100 Lecture Notes - Lecture 6: Blake Edwards, Kassidy, Scenic Design

Related Questions