BUSL 2550 Lecture Notes - Lecture 2: Bell Helicopter, Harry Blackmun, Wrongful Death Claim
12 Dec 2016
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Summary of international shoe co. v. washington, 326 u. s. 310, 66 s. ct. 154, 90 l. ed. International shoe co. (d, appellant) was a delaware corporation with its principle place of business in st. It had no offices in the state of washington and made no contracts for sale there. International shoe did not keep merchandise in washington and did not make deliveries of goods in intrastate commerce originating from the state. International shoe employed 11-13 salesmen for three years who resided in washington. Their commissions each year totaled more than ,000 and international shoe reimbursed them for expenses. Prices, terms, and acceptance or rejection of footwear orders were established through st. louis. Salesmen did not have authority to make contracts or collections. The state of washington brought suit against international shoe in washington state court to recover unpaid contributions to the unemployment compensation fund.
