Class Notes (838,171)
United States (325,312)
Philosophy (10)
PHI 115 (10)
Cleveland (10)
Lecture 12

PHI 115 Lecture 12: 4/12/17 - Environmental Ethics (2/3)
Premium

2 Pages
72 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHI 115
Professor
Cleveland
Semester
Spring

Description
Wednesday, April 12th, 2017 Lecture #12 Environmental Ethics (2/3) Baxter Essay Baxter sets up his introduction in the first 3 pages before he gets to what he needs to say. The four stiteria are the fundamental basis for doing environmental ethics 1 : Sphere of freedom is that every person should be free to do what he wishes but his actions must not interfere with other human beings. We all have the right to do whatever we want as long as it doesn’t infringe on the rights of others. 2 : Waste is a bad thing means we should respect the environment. 3 : Every human should be regarded as an end rather than as a means to be used for the bettermenthof another. 4 : Baxter explains his position 1) No other position corresponds to reality and how people think. 2) This attitude does not portend any mass destruction of the environment, animals, and plants. *Wants to set the stage that he’s not for the destruction of the environment 3) What is good for humans is good for animals and plans. Humans are surrogates for animal and plant life 4) There cannot be any other system and only humans can be afforded an opportunity to partake in collective decisions. 5) How exactly can we count the preferences of animals and plants? How can a person speak for animals and plants? Baxter believes the things in the environment should not be included in our utilitarian calculus. 6) What ought we do? Questions of ought are unique to the human mind and world, but they are meaningless to the non-human world, so we cannot include animals and plants. “I reject the proposition that we ought to respect the ‘balance of nature’ or to ‘preserve the environment’ unless the reason for doing so is the benefit of humans.” – basically stating whatever is good for us is good for animals and plants, but whatever is bad for us is probably bad for animals and plants. Baxter believes there is no right or morally correct state of nature because the moment humans have set foot on earth, the state of nature has immediately changed. Baxter does believes there are better and worse states of environment degradation, but he doesn’t believe we can go back to a utopian balance of nature. Baxter really wants to answer what level or state of nature is both goo
More Less

Related notes for PHI 115

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit