Class Notes (837,435)
United States (325,029)
Lecture

Lecture3PsychologyThoughtandLanguage.docx

3 Pages
106 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Linguistics
Course
01:615:371
Professor
Karin Stromswold
Semester
Fall

Description
Language and thought: Lecture 9/16 Linguistic determinism: Language determines thought Linguistic relativism: Language AFFECTS thought Language is the mold into which the mind is poured (Heinrich 1837) Determinism is the strongest version. People’s thoughts are determined by the catergories and structures provide by the language. The categories and structures of your language allow you to think. If you have no language you have no categories, no structures. There is no thought without language. Linguistic relativism is a much weaker claim. Diff languages are different and differences among languages will have implications for the way ppl think. The strongest version is that language affects your thoughts and your categories. Sort of medium version is that language affects memory; linguistic terms for something might help you remember something. Weakest version is categories in language you use affects or directs your language. Evidence against linguistic determinism: Animals can think, e.g. Raven’s theory of mind (TOM): can “trick” other ravens. Animals can have rich thoughts. Experiment by psychologists to see if ravens could distinguish colors; the ravens who knew what they were doing could open the correct canisters and get the food out. Small subordinate raven “tricked” the dominant raven from swooping in and eating his food. There is some kind of Theory of Mind, the ability to model what the other raven is thinking. Preverbal children can think: Adults who have lost language (aphasics) can still think Deaf isolate: pass complex TOM task. Person who is deaf, grew up in environment where there was no sign language. Doesn’t have much shot of learning a spoken language. Grow up as adults, no fluent in ASL or other sign language, not able to use spoken language. Lip reading is not able to help them much. Come to adulthood and don’t have a language, according to linguistic determinism they should not be able to think, however this is not true. They can perform normally on written IQ tests, sequencing tasks, matrices, etc. Sally-Anne TOM task. Deaf isolates perform very well with this experiment. In English the xDeaf isolates perform very well with this experiment. In English the syntax used to pose the questions is quite complex: “where will sally look for the chalk she originally placed in X location.” See book “A man without words by Schaller” for more interesting information of deaf isolates. LINGUISTIC RELATIVISM (SAPIR, 1929) Language affects thought. Human beings are very much at the mercy of the particular language which has become the medium of communication around them. ..We see and hear and otherwise experience very largely as we do because the language habits of our community predisposes our interpretations. Sapir had a student by the name of Whorf (1940). Whorf said we dissect nature along the lines laid down by our native languages, we cut nature up and organize it into concepts…largely because we are parties to an agreement to organize it this way. “The great Eskimo hoax” book is a fun study of language for extracurricular reading. “Empty” Gasoline Drums (Whorf, 1956). Whorf: The worker was tricked by the English word “empty.” The empty gasoline drum had vapors which were highly flammable. Behavior will tend to be different, physically the situation is hazardous but the linguistic analysis, the word empty is virtual synonym for inert, the workers assumed it was harmless to flick the cigarette butt. According to Pinker, it wasn’t the worker’s language, but it was his eyes that tricked him. The worker looked at the drum, thought there was nothing in it, and thought it was really empty. Whorf & Apache: syntax very different from English (it is an aglutanive language?). If you wanted to speak of a stream, the Apache would say "As water or springs, whiteness moving downward.” Whorf concluded that Apache people think very differently. The language doesn’t break things up as we do, doesn’t have words for objects and events and they don’t think the way we do
More Less

Related notes for 01:615:371

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit