SOC 248 Lecture Notes - Lecture 1: Intersectionality, Comparative Advantage, Gisselle

73 views9 pages
Jennifer Gisselle Marmol
SOC 248: Midterm 1
Topics
Inequality & Development (Blackboard); Sachs
Labor & Trade (Blackboard) Stiglitz; Kramer CH 5
Gender
Education (Blackboard) Sen; CH 8
Intersectionality
Chapter 1
Double divide : A phrase used by the author to talk about inequality on two levels
1) Between Countries
2) Within Countries
Gini coefficient: a measure of income inequality among values of a frequency
distribution. O reflects total equality, and 100 reflects max inequality. It’s a measure of
wealth distribution. i.e) Ethiopia is at a 30.0 because everyone there is equally poor.
Is inequality greater within or between countries? Gap between nations tend to be larger
than the gap within any single country.
Is inequality declining? Is that meaningful? To an extent.
o Not everyone benefits from globalization
o Wellbeing is more important than GDP* The fact that oncome is becoming more
equal does not take the indicators into considerations. Those problems are not
getting better and are sometimes getting worst.
Theories of the Economy Neoliberalism (Neoclassical)
Adam Smith’s Theory of the Economy: (1776) Freedom leads to greater wealth. He
means that everyone should have the right to pursue whatever economic pursuit is
meaningful to them. This will lead to maximizing profit. Pro-capitalist: means of
production should be privately owned and operated for profit in a competitive market.
Prevailing philosophy of the World Bank, IMF, WTO
Neoliberalism: free trade (no taxes), deregulation (reducing gov’t regulation), and privatization
Marx’s Theory of the Economy: he agreed that capitalism will bring economic growth,
but will NOT benefit all because
o Rise of the capitalist class (owners) depends on the exploitation of the proletariat
(workers)
o As machines become more productive, workers are displaced, and wages are
driven down
o Relationship between capitalist and workers is interdependent but still
explorative, meaning the owners need the workers and vise versa.
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 9 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Modernization Theory: is rooted in neoliberalism, with emphasis on economic growth through
trade, foreign investment, industrialization, modern technology, education, democracy
o Sources of underdevelopment are internal to the country. It says that the reason
poor country x is doing so bad is because they are not modernized.
World Systems/Dependency Theory: is rooted in Marxism
Foreign investment/trade bring exploitation: term of trade are rigged against the poor.
Distortion: Goods produced don’t serve local needs and as a result, the ecomony is not
self-sufficient. People making thing snot actually serving your community., This leads to
domination
Domination: poor countries become dependent on the rich countries
This theory illustrates that the poor countries weren’t always poor. Sources of
underdevelopment are external. Free trade and foreign investment leads to poor countries
lacking modernization .
Why are people poor in rich nations?
Welfare States
No country is purely capitalist, with no government involvement (third way economic)
Many sociologist point to the centrality of the welfare state for reducing poverty (all
poverty). The welfare (social safety net that redistributes resources)
Welfare social safety net that redistributes resources to most vulnerable
Example: child poverty before and after government intervention - taxes (Fig 1.2, page 29).
**Third way economics
**Patterns in child poverty before and after government intervention
**How does geography explain inequality in development? (Sachs reading)
What is Sachs’ solution? (Sachs reading)
Sachs advances a new explanation: geography
Natural resources (mountains, rivers, floodplains, rainfall)
Green Revolution: (help poor countries trying to increase agriculture) As a result,
practices were more efficient, and therefore more people moved into the city, economy
grew in Asia.
Tropical Climate/Disease Burden
Proximity to trade routes/high transport costs
What can be done? Aid from rich countries for irrigation, fertilizers, bed nets, highways, airports,
phone and internet cable. It requires: $160 billion a year (.5% GNP) It’s have of 1% of the GDP
of the rich countries. It’s double the current aid budget of those rich countries.
Problems/criticisms of Sachs’ solution (Sachs reading)
Problem with SACHS $160 Billion solution
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 9 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
It only increases dependency on the west. Relations with the west are exploited. He’s
underestimating poverty.
Unfulfilled promises, how can he assure that the west pays? How do we know that
money is going to go into the right hands and not undergo corruptions.
Who is monitoring the way that the money is giving? (domination in world system
colonization) In addition, the bureaucracy involved in monitoring the expenses would
cost additional expenses.
This money does not include every expense that will be necessary. For instance, money
allocated to wars, humanitarian events and cries, natural disasters, etc. He’s measuring
money at living on less than one dollar a day.
This plan is focused on sub-Saharan African, not on the rest of the world
Difficult to implement, feasibility of getting western countries on board
Would aid money even do anything? Unless properly allocated. Also, SACHS never
mentions slavery and its effects on these countries. It underestimates the history of
colonization. One size fits all prescription, he’s generalizing all poor countries as if
though they were all the same
Chapter 2
How does the division of labor affect society? (Smith, Ricardo, Marx, Durkheim)
Division of Labor: In simpler economic most people worked together or in
complimentary tasks.
How has this changed in modern times? Modernization, we have an increase in labor
How has division of labor affect society?
Adam Smith:
o when workers specialize, they are more efficient, leading to more efficient
production + markets = prosperity for everyone
o *but there’s a possibility for owners to manipulate
o *workers will no longer be self sufficient
David Ricardo
o Adam Smiths ideas extended internationally
o Comparative advantage + World trade = prosperity
o Small countries can become dependent on one or two products
o *What if a country’s advantage is in providing cheap labor or relaxed
environmental laws?
Emile Durkheim
o Agricultural societies had solidarity because they worked together and had
common
o Modern societies also find solidarity because people need each other
o Structural fundamentalism
Karl Marx
o Agreed with Adam Smith: division of labor, which brings productivity but it also
does the following: deskills workers, which leads to vulnerability
o Agreed with Durkheim’s industrialization an dhow it could lead to greater
solidarity but probably wouldn’t
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 9 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Labor & trade (blackboard) stiglitz; kramer ch 5. Chapter 1: double divide : a phrase used by the author to talk about inequality on two levels, between countries, within countries, gini coefficient: a measure of income inequality among values of a frequency distribution. O reflects total equality, and 100 reflects max inequality. It"s a measure of wealth distribution. i. e) ethiopia is at a 30. 0 because everyone there is equally poor. Gap between nations tend to be larger than the gap within any single country. To an extent: not everyone benefits from globalization, wellbeing is more important than gdp* the fact that oncome is becoming more equal does not take the indicators into considerations. Those problems are not getting better and are sometimes getting worst. Theories of the economy neoliberalism (neoclassical: adam smith"s theory of the economy: (1776) freedom leads to greater wealth. He means that everyone should have the right to pursue whatever economic pursuit is meaningful to them.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents