Class Notes (834,526)
United States (323,819)
CRMJ 254 (22)
Sealock (11)
Lecture 5

CRMJ 254 Lecture 5: CRMJ 254 Lecture 5
Premium

5 Pages
74 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Criminal Justice
Course
CRMJ 254
Professor
Sealock
Semester
Spring

Description
CRMJ 254 Lecture 5 Introduction to Criminal Justice • Rule of Law and How it Functions o Substantive Criminal Law vs. Procedural Law (or Criminal Procedure) o The criminal justice system exists to enforce substantive criminal law and follows the rules of procedural law to do it • Substantive Criminal Law o Laws defining acts subject to punishment and the punishments for those acts o Rules and restrictions on behavior that apply to all of us • Procedural Criminal Law / Criminal Procedure o Defines rules dictating how laws will be enforced o Places restrictions on the actions of agents of the state, not everyday citizens o All persons must be treated fairly and justly by government officials during the criminal justice process o Persons must be investigated, arrested, interrogated, prosecuted, tried, and punished in accordance with procedures prescribed by law o Found within the first ten amendments to the US Constitution (Bill of Rights) ▪ Most critical : 4 , 5 , 6 , and 8 amendments o Purpose is to prevent government from usurping the person freedom of citizens o Applied to state actions through the use of Due Process clause of the 14 th amendment ▪ Each individual state had its own unique body of procedural law, but ▪ The rules of criminal procedure contained in the Bill of Rights apply to those individual states as well o Fundamental Rules of Criminal Procedure • 4 amendment o Key words : unreasonable searches and seizures, warrants, probable cause o Prohibits “unreasonable” searches and seizures ▪ A person or property may be searched or seized ▪ Limits ability of police to search a person or property or to detain a person without justification o “Exclusionary rule” applies here ▪ Not part of the US Constitution of Bill of Right ▪ A rule formatted by the federal courts based upon their interpretation of the 4 amendment ▪ Enforced the principles of the 4 amendment ▪ Excludes from trial any evidence that was illegally obtained by authorities • What is a Search? o Governmental invasion of privacy with the intent to obtain incriminating evidence o A lawful search requires one of the following : ▪ A search warrant has been used ▪ No warrant has been issued, but : • Plain view doctrine apples • Consent to search was given • Exigent circumstances exist • There is diminished expectation of privacy • Search Warrants o Issued on the basis of probable cause o More than suspicion and definitely more than a hunch o Requires facts that would lead a person of reasonable caution to believe (not merely suspect) that a crime has been committed or that premises contain evidence of a crime o May be based on : ▪ Officer observation ▪ Officer expertise ▪ Informative communicated to officers o Arrests must be based on probable cause as well • Plain View Doctrine o Fruits or instruments of crime that are in plain view of law enforcement may be seized without a warrant, as long as ▪ Officer is in a location he/she is legally permitted to be ▪ Officer didn’t take extreme measures to get view ▪ Officer can’t move objects to get better view ▪ Officer’s discovery of item was “accidental” o Includes items in “plain feel”, “plain smell”, and “plain hearing” as well • Consent Search o Requires voluntary and intelligent consent o Who may legally provide consent? ▪ Suspect being investigated (“object/target of the search”) ▪ Third party, but only if : • Third part has a mutual use and joint access to, and control over, the property or premises • Object/target of the search assumes risk that third party might permit search o Third party consent examples ▪ Roommate –Yes, but • It depends on the areas to be searched o May grant consent to any “common areas” of a residence that is shared with the individual who is the target of the search o But any area where the target of the search has a reasonable expectation of privacy (i.e., bedroom not shared with a roommate) - NO ▪ Landlord – No • Cannot great third-party consent to search the residence of a rent- paying tenant o Assumes “ownership” over the residence while paying rent and has an expectation of privacy ▪ Next-door neighbor – No • Mutual use and joint access to property? • Does object of the search assume risk that neighbor could permit search? • Exigent Circumstances o Emergency situations o Certain situations call for immediate action and do not allow time to obtain search warrant ▪ Ongoing physical event involving possible danger to third party ▪ Imminent possibility of evidence disappearing before warrant can be obtained • Diminished Expectation of Privacy o Border search
More Less

Related notes for CRMJ 254

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit