CTD 231 Lecture 11: CTD 231 Chapter 11 Notes
Premium

4 Pages
93 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Clothing, Textiles and Interior Design
Course
CTD 231
Professor
Reaves
Semester
Spring

Description
CTD 231 Chapter 11 Notes Sizing and Fit Sizing • Sizing: assignment of individuals of particular body type into categories that reflect the body measurements of those in that size group • Sizing issues common to all categories of clothing but more fully documented in women’s ready-to-wear • Major source of sizing problems → diversity of U.S. population • FTC, DOC attempted to standardize; no mandatory standards in U.S. History of Women’s Apparel Sizing • Charts developed to reflect groupings of young and mature • First American sizing charts developed because catalog firms needed some consistency in measurement • Original charts inadequate with increasing diversity in population First Sizing Systems • Data collected by military in 1941 form women in the U.S. Army at the time • Revised by NIST in 1971 to reflect ethnic diversity and age group representation • Original military data reworked and adapted several times • 1994 ASTM published revision reflecting what was believed to be measurements in use Updates • 1980s University of Arizona at Tucson study of women over age 55; reflected need for fitting changes for mature customers • Last decade ASTM updated size ranges for petites and women’s sizes, added maternity • Many consumers, manufacturers, and retailers agree that voluntary sizing does not represent women’s body measurements New Body Measurement Data • SizeUSA → anthropomorphic study; purpose was to gather actual body measurement data on U.S. consumers using a 3D measurement system and body scanner and feed data into measurement extraction software • Janice Wang → cause of ill-fitting garments is industry misconception of hourglass figure as dominant body shape • Using SizeUSA data, Istook defined body shapes with four dominant types: ➢ Rectangle shape ➢ Spoon shape ➢ Inverted triangle ➢ Hourglass o Dominant shape closer to pear shape than hourglass ➢ Only 10-20% of most groups fit ASTM standard size tables Women’s Sizing • Sized for adult women; assigned numbers that reflect relationship of height, bust, waist, hip, and torso length measurements • Grade: difference from one size to next in range • Sample size: represents body measurements from which full size range is developed ➢ Commonly use midsize as sample size • Variations from one company to another can be extreme • Manufacturing contributing to size confusion by vanity sizing (placing smaller size label on larger size garment) • Size migration: customer typically fits into range of three or more sizes, depending on manufacturer and cut of garment • Consumers putting pressure on manufacturers to improve sizing systems • Pressure expected to increase with non-store purchases • Chico’s → unique sizing system, sizes 0-3 • Intellifit company uses scanner to collect store data (e.g., David’s Bridal) • Categories ➢ Misses ➢ Petites ➢ Talls ➢ Women’s Plus ➢ Women’s Petites ➢ Juniors ➢ Maternity ➢ Other → intimate wear, gloves Men’s Sizing • Men’s wear – more consistent than sizing of women’s wear, because men’s styles do not fluctuate as much as women’s • Categories ➢ Suits, jackets, and coats ➢ Pants ➢ Men’s furnishings o Shirts o Underwear o Sleepwear o Ties and accessories • Young men’s Children’s Sizing • Originally based on age groups; consumers should now purchase sizes ba
More Less

Related notes for CTD 231

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit