POL 118B Lecture 8: POL 118B Feb7

• School: UC-Davis
• Department: Political Science
• Course: POL 118B
• Professor: Robert Taylor

Document Summary

Locke makes his arguments from both revelation and reason: (cid:862)the gospel of jesus ch(cid:396)ist a(cid:374)d the ge(cid:374)ui(cid:374)e (cid:396)easo(cid:374) of (cid:373)a(cid:374)ki(cid:374)d . (cid:863) (cid:894)lct 17; cf. Eternal law > revelation > divine law > human law. Eternal law > reason > natural law > human law (deist view- revelation is nonsense and there is no such thing as divine law) The combination of both of these is theistic rationalism (main path is through reason; revelation is a reasonable supplement but if they conflict, you should stick to reason) T(cid:449)o e(cid:454)a(cid:373)ples of lo(cid:272)ke(cid:859)s a(cid:396)gu(cid:373)e(cid:374)ts f(cid:396)o(cid:373) revelation: (cid:862)the ki(cid:374)gs of the ge(cid:374)tiles e(cid:454)e(cid:396)(cid:272)ise lo(cid:396)dship o(cid:448)e(cid:396) the(cid:373), said ou(cid:396) a(cid:448)io(cid:396) to his dis(cid:272)iples, (cid:271)ut (cid:455)e shall (cid:374)ot (cid:271)e so. Luke (cid:1006)(cid:1006):(cid:1006)(cid:1009), (cid:1006)(cid:1010)(cid:863) (cid:894)lct 13) to distinguish between religious and political authority: (cid:862)the (cid:272)hu(cid:396)(cid:272)h, (cid:858)(cid:449)hi(cid:272)h judgeth (cid:374)ot those that a(cid:396)e (cid:449)ithout,(cid:859) (cid:1005) co(cid:396)i(cid:374)thia(cid:374)s (cid:1009):(cid:1005)(cid:1005), (cid:449)a(cid:374)ts it (cid:374)ot(cid:863) (lct 70) to argue in favor of maintaining civil rights for non-christians.