CRM/LAW C10 Lecture Notes - Lecture 12: Civil Rights Act Of 1964, Suspect Classification, Transsexual

90 views5 pages

Document Summary

Case precedent -> sex stereotyping is a form of sex discrimination + therefore is unconstitutional. Prohibited by the plain language of title vii. Schroer was not conforming to sex-based stereotypes. Sexual orientation + trans-sexuality are not yet overtly protected groups by law. Changing the way that presented her gender. Question: is the library of congress" revocation of the offer of employment to. Library of congress: not a violation of rights because trans-sexuals not protected by civil rights act -> defense rejected by courts. *no federal era but some states (california) have era -> gender considered suspect class in the way that race is. The right to privacy: gender, equality, and reproduction. Various substantive rights are comprised with the term liberty . Case is example of discrimination because of sex even though transgender individuals are not protected under title vii. Job offer given to schroer until found out was becoming a woman.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents