CRM/LAW C144 Lecture Notes - Lecture 12: Jackson King V, Costco, Condom

37 views8 pages

Document Summary

People v. burger: a woman working as an undercover agent for the district attorney, goes to d(cid:396). Bu(cid:396)ge(cid:396)"s, the defe(cid:374)da(cid:374)t"s offi(cid:272)e: he"s a ph(cid:455)si(cid:272)ia(cid:374) Or is there a point where you can no longer walk away: problematic, on one hand, you can say yes, o(cid:374) the othe(cid:396) ha(cid:374)d, (cid:449)e do(cid:374)"t k(cid:374)o(cid:449) (cid:449)hat"s i(cid:374) the (cid:271)la(cid:272)k (cid:271)ag, that he"ll t(cid:396)(cid:455) If we drew a line, it occurs before the last step but way after mere preparation to dissuade her later on. Commentators on dangerously proximate: preparation has to be so close that the crime is probably going to be committed, the act itself should be reflective of mens rea, require specific intent. Juries are going to differ as to how proximate one actually has to be. In the attempt hierarchy, people (cid:449)ould p(cid:396)o(cid:271)a(cid:271)l(cid:455) put mpc (cid:862)su(cid:271)sta(cid:374)tial step(cid:863) after res ipse loquitor but probably before dangerous proximity in the steps before the crime: deserve to be convicted of attempted robbery.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents