PSY BEH 11B Lecture Notes - Lecture 4: Loss Aversion, Base Rate, Affective Forecasting

90 views1 pages
-- DECISION MAKING 4 --
4 common heuristics that bias decision making:
1) Relative comparisons (anchoring and framing)
People often use comparisons to judge value
Feeling better when getting an 85 and finding out the class avg was 75
Being influenced by anchoring and framing
Anchor → reference point in decision making
Occurs when, in making judgments, people rely on 1st piece of info they
encounter or on info that comes most quickly to mind
Asking how many # residents in chicago depends on wording:
< 200,00 vs < 5,000,000
After making an initial judgment based on an anchor, people compare subsequent
info to that anchor and adjust away from the anchor until they reach a point
where the info seems reasonable
Framing → tendency to emphasize potential losses/gains from at least one alternative in
decision making
When people make choices, they may weigh losses and gains differently
Generally much more concerned with costs than benefits, aka loss aversion
Losses weigh more heavily than gains
2) Availability → general tendency to make a decision based on the answer that comes most
easily to mind (relying on info thats easiest to retrieve)
Recalling list of names day after presented to them and easily recalling celeb names
Info readily available biases decision making
3) Representativeness → tendency to place a person or object in a category if the person or
object is similar to our prototype in a category
Used then we base a decision on the extent to which each option reflects what we already
believe about a situation
Helena’s characteristics seem more like a cog psych than postal worker
Can lead to faulty thinking if we fail to take other info into account
Base rate → how frequently an event occurs
What people pay insufficient attention to b/c they focus more on whether
the info is representative of one conclusion or another
More postal workers then cog psych, maybe helena = post worker
4) Affective forecasting → tendency to overestimate how events will make them feel in the
future
Making sense of an event helps reduce its negative emotional consequences
After a negative event, people engage in strategies that will help them feel better
Unlock document

This preview shows half of the first page of the document.
Unlock all 1 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

4 co(cid:304)(cid:304)o(cid:305) heuristics that bias decisio(cid:305) (cid:304)aki(cid:305)g: relative comparisons (anchoring and framing) People often use comparisons to judge value. Feeling better when getting an 85 and finding out the class avg was 75. Anchor reference point in decision making. Occurs when, in making judgments, people rely on 1st piece of info they encounter or on info that comes most quickly to mind. Asking how many # residents in chicago depends on wording: After making an initial judgment based on an anchor, people compare subsequent info to that anchor and adjust away from the anchor until they reach a point where the info seems reasonable. Framing tendency to emphasize potential losses/gains from at least one alternative in decision making. When people make choices, they may weigh losses and gains differently. Generally much more concerned with costs than benefits, aka loss aversion.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents