Get 2 days of premium access
Class Notes (1,000,000)
US (430,000)
UC-Irvine (10,000)
SOC SCI (600)
Lecture 12

SOC SCI H1E Lecture Notes - Lecture 12: World Values Survey, Big Mac Index, Purchasing Power Parity


Department
Social Science
Course Code
SOC SCI H1E
Professor
Cailin O'Connor
Lecture
12

This preview shows page 1. to view the full 5 pages of the document.
Lecture 12
- The Data Revisited
- Does money predict more happiness, at a national level?
- Easterlin (1974) draws his data from a survey of 14 nations by Cantril (1965),
plus 9 more nations surveyed by Gallup
- His answer to the question is no
- Veenhoven (1991) uses the same data, but by presenting it differently, draws
different conclusion
- This data is both old (from 1960) and limited to 14 nations
- More recently a broader range of data has become available
- Since 1981, the World Values Survey has been conducted in six waves, having
surveyed 100 societes
- These surveys have resulted in over 1000 published papers
- The WVS studies a range of social, political, economic, and cultural factors, and
it tracks them over time – just as Easterlin (1995) argued was needed
-Schyns (1998) looked at the second wave of WVS data from 1990-1993
- 40 nations were studied, including “Taking all thing together” are they
very, pretty, etc. happy?
- In this survey about a question about life satisfaction is also asked – the
correlation between mean life satisfaction and mean happiness was .9,
which justifies using happiness as shorthand for both positive affect and
well being
- Schyns compared the mean happiness value with a quantity known as Purchasing
Power Parity (PPP)
- Schyns looks at this - also called “real GDP” - which looks at who at the
end of the day can acquire the goods and services that they need
-The Big Mac Index
is a measure of how much you can buy with
your money, but this is not what she uses
- Schyns found a strong correlation between happiness and PPP
- The correlation coefficient that measures the strength of the correlation
vary together – .64 with p<.001
- Is Wealth the Only Factor?
- Looking at data, one sees a clear upward trend: wealthier nations seem happier,
contrasting Easterlin
- There is no curvilinear relation, contrasting Veenhoven
- But there is a lot of variation
- Schyns hypothesizes that cultural factors account for at least some of the
remaining differences between happiness levels
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

- To test this hypothesis, she develops three measures of “cultural” aspects of
society, all relative to freedom
:
-Rights
- political rights and civil liberties, 1995 annual repott from
organization called “Freedom House.” Nations were rated on a scale of
0-1
-Gender
Empowerment
- women and men equal opportunities; equal in
political, professional, and economic spheres. Range 0-1, based on UN
index
-Individualism / Collectivism
- individualism is supposed to be “freer” than
collectivism; how much society values individuals over the collective,
scale on 1-10
- Schyns found correlations between these cultural factors and happiness
- However, the cultural factors are also strongly correlated with wealth
- If you try to control for PPP, you find that the cultural factors are no
longer predictors of happiness
- BUT if you only look at wealthy nations, cultural factors did matter even
after controlling for wealth: Correlation = .43
- So Does Culture Matter?
- Schyns is looking at a very narrow measure of culture here - all connected to her
definition of “freedom”
-Ye et al. (2014) conducted a similar study
- They used a richer collection of 9 cultural measures, rated on a 7 point
scale, from the Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior
Effectiveness (GLOBE) surveys, which covered 62 nations
- GLOBE Cultural Measures
- In-Group collectivism - measures focus on small groups, like families and small
friend circles
- Southern Europe, maybe Italy or Spain
- Institutional Collectivism - measures focus on institutions providing social
support
- Northern Europe, social democracy, pay more in taxes into strong social
safety net
- Power Distance - extent to which power is shared in society
- Gender Egalitarianism - Measures the degree to with gender differences are
minimized
- Uncertainty avoidance - measure extent to which society seeks for orderliness in
society
- Assertiveness Orientation - measures how much individuals are encouraged to
be competitive
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version