HIST 17C Lecture Notes - Lecture 6: Port Huron Statement, Executive Privilege, Liberal Democracy

47 views12 pages
School
Department
Course
Professor
Liberalism in the 1960s
Traits
Global intervention against communism
Domestic reform to end racism
Protect rights
Stimulate economic growth through government spending
View of law as most effective way of achieving social change
Changed since FDR
Represented economic redistribution, establishment of safety net, and global
intervention
Continuation of New Deal liberalism, but a little different
Liberals were unreliable allies
Supported the Civil Rights Movement in abstract but didn’t want African Americans to
integrate
Talked about supporting it but didn’t practice it
“Ten degrees left of center in good times”
“Ten degrees right of center when it affects him personally
Had a clear sense of limits and stopped short of fundamental social transformation or
wealth redistribution
Treated domestic reform and global intervention as interrelated
Treated law as the most effective means of achieving social change
If you changed the law, social change would follow
Liberalism at home was a way to win the Cold War
Law to achieve social change
Relied on litigation and federal courts
Brown v Board of Education set the paradigm for the Warren Court
most liberal court of the 20th C that spread rights consciousness
Vietnam War
Still a strong Cold War consensus that Vietnam should not be lost to communism
Representation of the culmination of the bipartisan commitment to the Cold War and
containment
Began as a war against French colonialism
Ho Chi Minh
Led the war against French colonialism for independence
He was a communist, but more importantly, he was a nationalist dedicated to the idea of
national independence
Strategy: guerilla warfare
Win the hearts and minds of people among whom the guerilla moved and the
conventional enemy forces would be defeated
Assumed he would have the support of the US
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 12 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
US wanted to please the French because it saw Western Europe as buffer
against the Soviet Union
French wanted economic aid in reconquering their colony of Vietnam
National Liberation Front
United communists and non-communists fighting against South Vietnam
Political arm of the North Vietnamese struggle against Diem
Geneva Accords 1954
Result of French defeat
Temporarily divided VIetnam at the 17th parallel, pending national elections in 1956 to
reunify Vietnam
In the interim, status of North and South Vietnam remained fluid
Northern Vietnam became communist under Ho Chi Minh
Why did Ho, the winner of the war, accept only half of Vietnam?
He counted on elections being held
Believed all of Vietnam would be unified as an independent, communist
state
Believed in building up North Vietnam first
Socialist development of the economy that could compete with the South
Diem
Anti-communist and nationalist
First President of South Vietnam
US hoped he would provide an alternative to France’s colonialism and Ho’s communism
US provided financial assistance into South Vietnam
US and Diem prevented national elections from occurring
Knew that Ho would win authorization to reunify Vietnam
Redefined Geneva Accords to create two separate nations
Insurgency after he refused to hold national elections
Diem associated them with Ho Chi Minh
Labeled his opponents “vietnamese commies” → “vietcong”
Vietcong received little aid from Ho because he was still focused on rebuilding
the North
What was the war?
Supporters of the anti-war movement saw the National Liberation front as a spontaneous
movement
Rebellion against the repressive Diem
Against imperialism of US
Vietnamese was not about two supporters
Was a war about one country with two warring factions
Weaker had been created by the US
US supporters saw Vietcong as a puppet of Ho
The war, in its “American phase” was an internal revolt based in the South
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 12 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Received some support from the North that increased as time went one
North Vietnam was acting as the agent of the Soviets and Chinese
The South was the victim of external aggression
This ignored the fact that the US had created the nation of South Vietnam
John F Kennedy
Foreign policy
Concerned with proving American dominance
Made reckless decisions that grew out of America’s need to show dominance
Bay of Pigs
JFK and LBJ shared in Cold War consensus
saw the worlds (first, second, third) in terms of black and white
Didn’t always live up to ideals of liberalism for US domestically
Epitomized the culture of “coolness”
Arrival to replace the old men of the 1950s signified the beginning of a transformation in
lifestyles
Rhetoric of “doing your own thing”
Suggested the way that politics in the 1960s mingled with new attitudes towards
lifestyle, customs, and institutions
JFK prefigured the melding of politics and lifestyle
JFK never liked French colonialism, but didn’t want to be responsible for South Vietnamese fall
to communism
Communists were successful because they adopted unconventional tactics
Guerilla warfare
Believed in winning the hearts and minds of people
Counterinsurgency was the “thinking man’s war”
Emphasized a combination of civilian, political, military activity to:
encourage nation-building
encourage democracy
win hearts and minds of Vietnamese people
counter efforts of guerilla fighters
Put his faith in Diem
Diem was too dictatorial
By 1961, Diem’s situation was deteriorating
JFK sent advisors to South Vietnam
By 1963, it was clear that if South Vietnam were to be saved from defeat, it must get rid
of Diem
Repressiveness and unpopularity convinced JFK that his regime must go
CIA became involved in plots to overthrow Diem
Diem’s generals organized the coup → overthrew Diem → murdered him
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 12 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

View of law as most effective way of achieving social change. Represented economic redistribution, establishment of safety net, and global intervention. Continuation of new deal liberalism, but a little different. Supported the civil rights movement in abstract but didn"t want african americans to integrate. Talked about supporting it but didn"t practice it. Ten degrees left of center in good times . Ten degrees right of center when it affects him personally . Had a clear sense of limits and stopped short of fundamental social transformation or wealth redistribution. Treated domestic reform and global intervention as interrelated. Treated law as the most effective means of achieving social change. If you changed the law, social change would follow. Liberalism at home was a way to win the cold war. Brown v board of education set the paradigm for the warren court. Most liberal court of the 20th c that spread rights consciousness.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers