PHIL 165 Lecture Notes - Lecture 6: Equal Protection Clause, Fourteenth Amendment To The United States Constitution, Antonin Scalia
Document Summary
Scalia believes only procedural due process matters. All the text says is that procedural due pro(cid:272)ess, the(cid:374) (cid:374)o li(cid:271)erties prote(cid:272)ted fro(cid:373) state la(cid:449)/trial su(cid:271)sta(cid:374)ti(cid:448)e due pro(cid:272)ess means minimum wage/worker conditions goes out the window. Law required laundromats to operate only if they had permits. 90% of laundromats were (cid:272)hi(cid:374)ese, (cid:271)ut the (cid:272)ity (cid:449)ould (cid:374)ot issue a(cid:374)yo(cid:374)e of (cid:272)hi(cid:374)ese des(cid:272)e(cid:374)t a pe(cid:396)(cid:373)it sued for writ of habeas corpus, violated equal protection of 14th amendment. Supreme court says evil eye, biased enforcement was a practical denial by the state of that equal protection of the law. Louisiana (cid:272)(cid:396)eated sepa(cid:396)ate (cid:396)ail(cid:396)oad (cid:272)a(cid:396)s fo(cid:396) (cid:271)la(cid:272)ks a(cid:374)d (cid:449)hites plessy (cid:1011)/(cid:1012)ths (cid:449)hite, Sat in white car, refused to move, and was arrested. Claimed the law violated the privileges and immunities and equal protection clauses of the 14th amendment. Supreme court ruled no. the state law was within its boundaries, 14th amendment established equality before the law, not necessarily socially (just political equality).