Class Notes (838,386)
United States (325,381)
POT 2002 (5)
All (4)

Introduction to Political Theory [COMPLETE NOTES PART 2] - got a 4.0 in the course!

7 Pages
Unlock Document

Political Science
POT 2002
All Professors

Lecture 1/30/13 – Machiavelli **For exam, compare Discourses and The Prince I. Machiavelli in Context a. Florence under the Medicis, who were largely autocrats caught in a power play among emerging imperial forces of France and Spain, whilst Florence was a tiny city-state. b. Dominican Friar Savan Rola condemns the Medici as giving away Florence’s security. Machiavelli witnessed his execution. c. New Republican government under Piero Soverini under which Machiavelli becomes an active political participant. i. Medici come back and push Machiavelli out of power. Treat it like a principality and arrest Machiavelli, tortured and eventually let him go, where he writes. [the discourses and the prince] pg. 69: “put on regal robes..dressed in appropriate manner enter into ancient courts of ancient men”. Confers with ancients in belief that history can tell things about politics that are relevant and applicable today. Takes recollections from history and collated them in the Prince. ii. Transforms classical and Christian morality into a different kind of political morality, not something that is completely immoral d. Lorenzo D’Medici inherits a completely new principality…Machiavelli offers him advice… found himself in a position of power by way of good fortune and the arms/assistance of others, not because he earned it. i. Getting it and keeping it are 2 different things ii. Machiavelli attempts to ingratiate himself to his former torturers to get himself back into political power iii. How should the Prince behave? II. The Content of the Form in The Prince III. The Machiavellian Revolution IV. The Concept of Virtu a. Pg 160: skillful behavior according to circumstance; a conventional political morality that consists of titration of good and evil in the right amounts. b. The Goddess Fortuna: in order that free will not be extinguished, fortune is arbiter of ½ of our actions. Rest left to self control. She shows force where there is no organized strength to resist. c. Christians say free will doesn’t matter at all; Gd can overhaul everything d. How do you build embankments to channel fortune with the ½ that is allotted to you by free will? i. Machiavelli says you have to do it with virtu. Pg 160 “prince who relies completely on fortune will ruin as she changes…man who adapts will succeed, man who sets his course of action out of tune with the time will come to grief. Behave accoding to what circumstance necessitates/requires to win fortune”. Does not always require the same thing. An advice book meant to describe how Lorenzo d’Medici can survive/thrive in dangerous set of circumstances Resuscitate classical inheritance and bring Earthly glory back. A life of politics is the only way to achieve true glory. Return to the center of human life. Vital to human existence. Fortuna is partially malleable; can be won over by certain behavior. Christians, on the other hand, did not consider Gd amenable to being won over; belief in fate. Machiavelli, however, said fortune could be hemmed in. Lecture 2/4/13 – Machiavelli I. Virtu and the Machiavellian revolution a. However, differs from the classical past in some ways. Classical people believed that Fortuna could be won over by virtue, which should be put into public political service and achieve Earthly glory. b. Machiavelli, however, says fortuna is not won over by virtue, but virtu. Being willing to attune one’s behavior to changing circumstance. c. Pg 126-127 ch 15 “departs radically from the procedures of others; suitable to search after truth rather than imagined one…principalities that have never been known to exist in reality. For there is such a gap between how one lives and how one ought to live…that one learns his ruin rather than his preservation…being good at all times will come to ruin…it is necessary for a prince to learn how not to be good, and to use this knowledge, or NOT, according to necessity.” i. Circumstance dictates the extent to which the prince should be willing not to be virtuous. Empirical, not normative. d. Pg 128: “virtue pursued ends in destruction, vice results in safety and well-being” e. Applies conceptual scaffolding to resuscitated classical teachings II. Machiavelli vs. The Classical Past a. Juxtaposes his concept of virtu against ancient notion of virtue, goes against Cicero, who argues that virtuous behavior is essential for the political entity to thrive. b. Generosity vs. Miserliness i. Cicero: generosity is highly tied to justice ii. Machiavelli: [ch 16] While generosity confers a good reputation, …. You can give in ways that nobody sees, which is pointless because it doesn’t bolster your reputation. If you give on a grand scale as a political leader, you’ll go broke and be pushed out of power. All you need is enough money to defend people c. Fear vs. Love i. Should the prince cultivate fear or love? ii. Cicero: love is essential, it creates unity and common purpose [concord], builds up good faith [bona fide]…Plato agrees. Cruelty is dangerous. The peak of perfection of glory lies in if the masses love you, have faith in you, and think you worthy of honor and admiration. Mercy wins you love. iii. Machiavelli: it’s great to be considered merciful, but if considered too merciful, subject may not stay united, so cruelty might be necessary, although it might be feared which is a danger. Men are ungrateful, fickle, deceivers, greedy, avoiders of danger, and ingratiating. When danger comes near, however, they betray the prince, resulting in his ruin. Love is held together by chain of obligation which is broken when self interest is concerned, but fear is held together by dread of punishment [133] “men love at their own pleasure and fear at the pleasure of the prince, prince should belong foundation on what belongs to him.” d. Honesty: Or, of Lions and Foxes i. Cicero: public conduct rooted in honesty, essential feature. Honesty necessary to faith and trust and unity. Predicated on honesty. Most indicative of what it means to be a human being. There are times when the bestial nature of man must come into play; such as when the romans went to war. But it must be carried out in an honest way. The recourse to force Plato says white lies are indicative of underlying truths. Injustice may be done through force or to deceit. Deceit deserves a greater hatred. Even when you have to be the lion, you should never be the fox. ii. Machiavelli: pg 133-134 “2 means of fighting; one according to the laws, one with force…the first is proper to man, although it may not always be sufficient, so a prince must know how to use wisely the natures of the beast and man. One without the other cannot endure. The lion cannot defend itself from traps and fox cannot frighten the wolves…must be a fox to recognize the traps and lion to frighten the wolves. If men were all good, this rule would not be good. But men are a sorry lot…a prince never lacks legitimate reasons to break his promises. Men are simple minded and controlled by present necessities that one who deceives will always find another who allows himself to be deceived…”. (there is a weak sucker born every second!) 1. Plays on theme of appearance; when you ARE deceiving, you must appear NOT to be deceiving. All images and play. Appearances are crucial. Should not stray from the good, but should know how to enter into evil when necessity commands. Few perceive what you are, and those few refuse to contradict the opinion of the many, where there is no impartial arbiter. a. Like plato, shadows on the wall. Realm of being is true reality, this is simply the realm of seeming. III. What Virtu is Not… and Is (Exemplarity) a. Both negative and positive: b. Virtu is NOT: i. Hagotocles: wickedness. Pg 103-104… consistently behaves in evil ways. Not redeeming. Unvirtuous behavior for its own sake. It cannot be called skill…one can acquire power, but not glory. Vicious, inhumane, dishonorable…one cannot attribute to either fortune or skill what he accomplished without either. Brutality for no higher end or purpose other than affliction. ii. Savonrolla [Dominican friar who talked about purging corruption from Florence and reinstituting the Republic]: he plays the role of the unarmed prophet, somebody with good principles but has no means of employing them because he does not have requisite level of force behind him [pg 95] …armed were victorious, unarmed came to ruin. Strength of principles not sufficient to win the day. c. Virtu IS: i. Borgia: Ramiro d’Ori: unruly province…Borgia sends Ramiro to pacify the provence and employ force. Instills fear, but so much fear that he was killed, himself. One scholar calls recourse “economy of violence”, the briefest fashion. Machiavelli relies on a particular act of cruelty…not violence for violence’s sake, but violence for a higher purpose. Compares hagothacles and Borgia…talks about cruelty “well used” which are carried out in a single stroke out of necessity to protect, and not contuned, but instead, converted into the greatest possible benefits for the subjects. Minimal in application. Lecture 2/6/14 “Cruelty well used”… converted into the greatest possible benefits for the subjects Machiavelli does not think principalities are the best form of government Pg 285 “this is the result of nothing other than the fact that government by the people is BETTER than the government of princes”… pg 296 “origins of love of this government….cities have never increased wealth except while during freedom…consider Rome…for it is the private good and not private gain…but ONLY in Republics…those who benefit are so numerous that they are able to advance it. The contrary happens when there is a prince.” Titus Livius: The discourses are a commentary on a history written by Roman historian Titus Livius. I. Machiavelli on History a. As Treasure Chest i. Makes argument as to why history itself is important: Pg 170-171 “antiquity….”…thinks it’s ironic that people reconstruct and dig up pottery and material relics, which people value. But the real value of the past is what it can teach us. It is a repository of examples of how human beings grapple with fundamental problems. ii. Sadly, man disregards precedent in law. Pg 171 “erroneous way of thinking…I deemed it necessary to write …what I judge necessary for a better understanding….practical knowledge one should seek from history books”. b. As rooted in Human Nature and Therefore Timeless i. Idea further amplified by assumption: transhistorical “essentialist” notion. People are the way they are, irrespective of time. 1. Large negative reservoirs of ill will, self interest, greed. Pg. 252
More Less

Related notes for POT 2002

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.