HLT 1353 Lecture 4: HLT 1353 FIRST ESSAY MENTAL HEALTH 5 PTS

55 views2 pages

greydolphin150

3 Oct 2018

School

University of Houston

Department

Health Education

Course

HLT 1353

Professor

kiran rafique

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

When i was 6 years old i was living with my father while my mom was working in the united states of america. So, my siblings and i went to live with my father in his farm and we brought our dog as well. My dad went to check another farm he had in another town. So, my siblings and i stayed ourselves in the farm. We had a really huge yard and we had two dogs. While we were playing in the yard we were making loud noises and one of the dogs broke its cage. At the moment, i did not know what was happening to my siblings. A few moments later, i saw the dog running towards me and i tried to stand up and run, but i could not run away and the dog bit my right hand and i fell down.

Related Questions

Questions covering the articles "King Tut's DNA" and "The Risksand Rewards of Royal Incest."? Questions 1- 11 come from "KingTut's DNA." Questions 12-15 come from "The Risks and Rewards ofRoyal Incests."

Ive got some of the answers i just want to make sure they areright and need help with the others.

Question 1:

Tutankhamun was _____ when he ascended the throne. I answerd9

the anwers for the question to choose from were: 7, 9, 19,25

Question 2:

Tutankhamun reigned for _____ years. I put 10

the answers provided to choose from were: 10, 15, 23, 47

QUESTION 3:

Why had Dr. Hawas resisted DNA anaylsis of royal mummies priorto this study?

He was afraid of envoking a curse by disturbing the mummies

The embalming process was believed to make it impossible tocollect DNA.

The possibility of obtaining workable DNA samples withoutcontamination was just too great to justify disturbing themummies.

The mummies would have to be completely destroyed to collect theDNA.

QUESTION 4:

Why did the scientists collect the samples from deep inside thebones of the mummies?

Bones are the only tissue that remained to sample.

To avoid contamination from the priests and archeologists thathad handled the mummies, as well as the researchers themselves

QUESTION 5:

The DNA was easily extracted from the samples collected from themummies. TRUE OR FALSE

QUESTION 6:

DNA from the ______ chromosome was used to determine thatAmenhotep III, the KV55 mummy and Tutankhamun were related. Myanswer was the Y chromosome.

the answers provided to choose from were: 1, 21, X, Y

QUESTION 7:

DNA sequencing determined that ________ was Tutankhamun's fatherand __________ was his grandfather.

my answer for this is: KV55 mummy; Amenhotep III

the provided answers to choose from were: KV55 mummy; AmenhotepIII -----OR------Amenhotep III; KV55 mummy

QUESTION 8:

Through DNA analysis and a CT scan to determine tha age of theKV55 mummy, scientists determined that the identity of the mummywas __________. MY answer is: Smenkhkare

the provided answers to choose from were: Smenkhkare, Akhenaten,or Amenhotep III

QUESTION 9:

Through the DNA analysis, scientists determined thatTutankhamun's parents were ___________. I choose brother andsister

the provided answers to choose from were: first cousins, secondcousins, brother and sister,

father and daughter

QUESTION 10:

Which physical defects did Tutankhamun suffer from that wouldhave resulted from the genetic closeness of his parents? I chooseall of the above.

The provided answers to choose from were: club foot, a toe wasmissing a bone and other bones missing from his foot were distroyedby necrosis (tissue death), partial cleft palate, all of theabove.

QUESTION 11:

Incomplete evidence that Tutankhamun married his half sistercame from________.

Historical knowledge that his wife, Ahknhesenamun, was thedaughter of Akhenaten (Tut's father) and Nefertiti.
The two female fetuses found in his tomb.

Both A and B.
Neither, there is no evidence that they were related.

QUESTION 12:

While European royalty avoided sibling incest, they did marryclose cousins. TRUE OR FALSE

I choose TRUE

QUESTION 13:

Genetic overlap resulting in congenital defects is one possiblereason for the almost univerasal taboo against incest. What is thepercentage of genetic overlap between full siblings?

6.25%
12.5%

25%
50%

QUESTION 14:

Royal incest has been documented in ancient Egypt, Inca Peru,the Hawaiians and Thailand. Despite the obvious drawbacks ofcondensing genetic lines, which answer was not a reason thatroyalty ignored the taboo and practiced brother/sister andcousin/cousin pairings

Because they were royalty and they thought they were not subjectto the same biological laws as common people.

Marrying family protects assets and concentrates power.

Forges alliances between royal houses, while keeping power amongkin

Royalty had the money to pay for medical care.

QUESTION 15:

Rulers did not always mate solely with siblings. Many kings andpharaohs had children with unrelated consorts and concubinesensuring healthy offspring in case none resulted from theirmarriages
TRUE or FALSE

turquoiselouse723

One of the major problems with the economy is too many economists! Or perhaps too many politicians who think they understand economics. When politicians seek to improve the conditions in the economy they come up with what at first blush appears to be a great idea. Look at all the people who will be helped! It is not seen that is the problem it is unseen. Adam Smith's invisible hand. It is called The Law of Unintended Consequences. A politician sets out, for the best of reasons, to help a group---the homeless as an example---but in the process, far more people are harmed than helped. The results really don't matter you see because they tried but it simply didn't work. It was the politician's fault! After all, they tried to do something and that's what counts, not the results. The results do not matter.

One example was the Urban Renewal Program in the 1970s. In the processes of cleaning up and renewing city centers, SROs (Single room occupancies) were destroyed. These were cheap rooms that could be rented at a minimal price. It allowed very low-income people to have a room and shelter from the elements. But where were these people to go after urban renewal? This was one of the main causes of what has become a homeless problem.

Another example of this is my experience while living in Arkansas and teaching at Arkansas State. Interest rates were rising rapidly making it difficult for low-income families to obtain mortgages and other consumer loans. This was a time when if you had a mortgage at 14% you had a good one. Then Gov. Clinton, again for the best of reasons, asked the legislature to cap the interest rates at 10 percent. This is called Usury Law. The term Usury goes back at least as far as Thomas Aquinas and his book, The Summa Theologica which dates back to about 1244 AD. It was believed that charging interest on a loan was unchristian and downright evil. It was on this theory that Gov. Clinton based his thinking.

Once again the unseen took hold. All money flowed out of Arkansas into the neighboring states where it could earn a higher return. This is a natural consequence of a price ceiling, which this is. This is the maximum price that can be charged for a good or service. In economics and finance, there is a concept known as the Purchasing Power Parity Theory. Money (resources) flow to the market where it gets the greatest return. In finance, it is also known as arbitrage which is also the basis for most of the world trade. Investment flows to the areas with the highest return. In any event, the Usury Law was a disaster! No one could get a loan in the state as the money flowed to the neighboring states where it could earn a higher return. The Gov. called a special session of the legislature and the law was repealed.

This is also one of the differences between Keynesian and Austrian economists---of which I count myself. If we take a Keynesian and an Austrian economist to the shore of a small lake and give each of them a large rock to throw in the water, The Keynesian will throw the rock, watch them splash, and maybe see the wake the rock created. The Austrian will throw the rock, see the splash, watch the wake spread out from the point of impact. He will also see the boat moored on the opposite shore with a hole in the hull at the waterline. He will see the water lap in and the boat sink. The Keynesian never even knew the boat was there. When something is proposed, Austrian economists carry the effects out to their logical conclusion. Keynesian's, to the primary and perhaps secondary results but rarely to the tertiary. Again what happens as a result of their actions is no concern of theirs because it was the attempt that mattered.

One embedded question.

What is the benefit of carrying an idea to its logical conclusion? Or is there any benefit?

whiterabbit790

HLT 1353 Lecture 4: HLT 1353 FIRST ESSAY MENTAL HEALTH 5 PTS

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

[NURS 387] - Final Exam Guide - Everything you need to know! (59 pages long)

ENGL 101W Lecture Notes - Lecture 4: Velour

[NURS 387] - Midterm Exam Guide - Comprehensive Notes for the exam (29 pages long!)

Related Questions