CYAF 280 Lecture 25: Singlehood
Premium

3 Pages
98 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Child, Youth and Family Studies
Course
CYAF 280
Professor
Rochelle Dalla
Semester
Spring

Description
Singlehood Finding Someone to Date: Field of Eligible • Marriage Marketplace: trading 'goods' (personality, humor, intelligence, physical attributes) • Limited by: ◦ Field of eligibles: those deemed "appropriate" by cultural standards ◦ Endogamy: rules, norms, social customs and law which dictate marriage to someone who IS a member of a group the person belongs (religion, race, caste) ◦ Exogamy: Rules, norms, social customs, and laws which dictate marriage to someone OUTSIDE a social group in which a person belongs ◦ Homogamy: personal choice based on similar group characteristics ◦ Heterogamy: personal choice based on different group characteristic's • Types of Singles ◦ Come down to choice and state • Ambivalents: Singlehood is temporary and it is voluntary ▪ Not actively seeking • Wishfuls: Singlehood is temporary but is involuntary ▪ Actively seeking • Resolveds: Singlehood is permanent and it is voluntary ▪ Dedicated lives to religious groups or work • Regretfuls: Singlehood is permanent and is involuntary Meeting --> Couple? How do you move from "meeting" to "dating" to a "couple"? • Murstein Stimulus Value Role Theory ◦ Stage 1: Stimulus -- attracted to other before (very little) interaction. Little information for evaluation ◦ Stage 2: Value -- weigh values for compatibility. Outcomes - move on or disengage ◦ Stage 3: Role -- analyzes other's behavior ◦ Stages similar regardless of use of technology. Differences in rapidity • Critiques ◦ Is this generalizable to all "dating" relationships? Theory assumes "marriage" or committed relationship is goal ◦ Not compatible with "storgic" orientation to love ◦ Stages 2 (value) and 3 (role) reversed for some ◦ Culturally bound-based on culturally specific values of "romance" and "love" as prerequisites to marriage how transferable?   Cohabiting Relationships: Living together before marriage • Cohabitation: Huge increase last 50 years ◦ 1960: 430,000 couples ◦ 2012: 7.8 million couples (heterosexual only) • Why more acceptable/widespread? ◦ Climate of sexuality more liberal; moreal criterion shifted -- love not marriage
More Less

Related notes for CYAF 280

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit