According to the concept of genetic-environment correlation, a. The environments to which we are exposed determine our genotype b. Our genes affect how we respond to the environment c. We tend to seek out social partners with a similar genetic makeup d. Our genes influence the environments to which we are exposed

answer

watching

178

views

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

You have 0 free answers left.
Get unlimited access to 3.8 million step-by-step answers.

Get unlimited access

Already have an account? Log in

Bunny GreenfelderLv2

26 Jul 2018

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.

Already have an account? Log in

Related questions

. Identical twins share the same genotype, meaning their geneticmakeup is the same. Researchers have discovered, however, that thephenotype (or the observable expression of a gene) of identicaltwins grows apart as they age. Our genes influence how we respondto our environment, and at the same time the expression of ourgenes are changed by the environment around us; therefore therelationship between genetic and environmental influences cannot beeasily separated In sum, it is easier to find sociological,cultural, or environmental explanations for variation in humanabilities, intelligence, or personality traits. The seeminginheritance by family of some of these traits may well be acombination of something genetic and something experiential orcultural, but when looking for the actual underlying causes,genetics has repeatedly come up wanting while environmentalexplanations do a good job of addressing a fairly large part of thevariation we see.

rewrite the text to look like if it's your own writing tryto change as much world as you can :)thanks in advance

For years we have been able to analyze the fossils of extincthumans like those of Neanderthals. Their bones gave us clues to howthey looked, how they lived, and how they might be related to us.In the last few years, we have been able to get a better view intothese extinct species and their relationship to our species. Thanksto next generation genomic sequencing technologies, we have beenable to obtain genetic data on Neanderthals, Denisovans and othersthat have allowed us to make direct comparisons between our speciesand theirs. In addition, we have been able to observe the presenceof DNA from these extinct species within our own genomes which tellus that we had kids with these now extinct humans.

If we take Neanderthal DNA as an example, we find that we share99.5 percent of our DNA with them. Which means that we andNeanderthals were separated from each other for more than 500,000years. This also means that we were genetically similar enough tobe able to have offspring with each other. We see evidence of thisgenetic introgression between us and Neanderthals when we look atour DNA. Interestingly, if we obtain one thousand DNA samples fromGrossmont College students, we estimate that we would be able toextract at least 20% of the Neanderthal genome from them. Thismeans that 20% of our collective nucleotide sequences are sharedwith Neanderthals but this doesnât mean that 20% of our genes areNeanderthal specific genes. Of the twenty-one thousand genes thatNeanderthals had, only a few dozen of their genes survive withinour genome. The same holds true for Denisovans. What is moreinteresting is that older versions of ourselves have a tendency tohave higher levels of DNA from extinct humans compared toourselves. In other words, over the course of thousands of years wehave been slowly weeding out the DNA of the other humans from ourgenome in favor of our genes.

One basic question that we might like to ask is why have we beenlosing Neanderthal and Denisovan genes over time? Also, why do westill have a significant amount of DNA segments that donât seem tobe going anywhere? The answer to this has to do with selection.

The answer to the first part of the question has to do with thefact that we were not fully genetically compatible with the otherhuman species to begin with. Basically, to have had Neanderthal orDenisovan genes in the past meant that an individual's level offitness was reduced. To get rid of their genes in favor of our ownwould mean that the relative fitness of individuals would increaseovertime.

The answer to the second question has to do with the fact thatDNA segments from Neanderthals and Denisovans that did not code forproteins remained because there was little selective pressureagainst them. As far as genes are concerned, the only Neanderthaland Denisovan genes that remain only exist because they had aselective advantage or at least have been neutral to ourspecies.

DNA segments that that were neutral or that had a selectiveadvantage, whether genes or not, simply remained because they wereadvantages or there was little selective pressure against them.

Your task for this week is to look for information about oneNeanderthal or Denisovan gene that survive within our species andto tell me what function that gene has and how that gene mayincrease the fitness of modern human populations.

In your post, discussONE Neanderthal orDenisovan gene that is currently found within our species.
- Tell us about the gene and its function. Explain what it doesfor us. (Make sure you give a citation.)
- Explain in your own words any possible advantages that yourNeanderthal or Denisovan gene might have. Make sure you give ininformed opinion that is grounded in your research.

azurecrow764

According to Dr. Jeffrey Friedman, the primary reason that we fail to lose weight from dieting is: A) Lack of willpower. B) The basic drive to eat will win out every time. C) The first law of thermodynamics. D) Very recent changes in our environment. E) All of the above are correct.