Rent controls force landlords to price apartments below the equilibrium price level. An immediate effect is a shortage (excess demand) of apartments, because the quantity of apartments demanded is greater than the quantity supplied at the regulated price.
When cities prevent landlords from charging market rents, which of the following are common long-run outcomes? Check all that apply.
The future supply of rental housing units increases.
Efficient use of housing space results.
Nonprice methods of rationing emerge.
The quantity of available rental housing units falls.
Rent controls force landlords to price apartments below the equilibrium price level. An immediate effect is a shortage (excess demand) of apartments, because the quantity of apartments demanded is greater than the quantity supplied at the regulated price.
When cities prevent landlords from charging market rents, which of the following are common long-run outcomes? Check all that apply.
The future supply of rental housing units increases.
Efficient use of housing space results.
Nonprice methods of rationing emerge.
The quantity of available rental housing units falls.
For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.
Related textbook solutions
Related questions
Who bears the primary costs of a rent control program?
A. | landlords | |||||||||||||
B. | renters that get rent-controlled apartments | |||||||||||||
C. | taxpayers | |||||||||||||
D. | the wealthy Assume the demand for sushi is Qd = 180 - 3P, where Qd is quantity demanded and P = price in dollars. The supply of sushi is Qs = 80 + 5P, where Qs is quantity supplied (and P is, again, price in dollars). A price of $20 would result in:
|
US agricultural price supports are politically popular because
A. | They have no adverse impacts | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
B. | The US would have food shortages without them | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. | The benefits accrue to a large number of voters and the costs are paid by a small number of voters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D. | The costs are spread out among millions of people Assume the demand for sushi is Qd = 180 - 3P, where Qd is quantity demanded and P = price in dollars. The supply of sushi is Qs = 80 + 5P, where Qs is quantity supplied (and P is, again, price in dollars). What would be the equilibrium price?
Price floors and ceiling prices:
|