1.Assertion: The conclusion is based on (is supported by) a comparison of the utilities of the alternative courses of action. (please select True or False)
2.Assertion: The author is using moral values alien to consequentialism. Alternative wording of question: The author is using moral values other than the single moral value accepted by consequentialism (please select True or False)
3.Assertion: The author is putting the cart before the horse. She does assume or assert something(s) about the ultimate moral value of the alternative actions she is considering before she finishes the analysis. (please select True or False)
4.Assertion: The analysis is faithful the facts of the case, as given in the case description; it is not altering these facts. (please choose True or False)
5.Assertion: The analysis considers two or more actions, and all of these actions are in the protagonist's power. (please choose True or False)
1.Assertion: The conclusion is based on (is supported by) a comparison of the utilities of the alternative courses of action. (please select True or False)
2.Assertion: The author is using moral values alien to consequentialism. Alternative wording of question: The author is using moral values other than the single moral value accepted by consequentialism (please select True or False)
3.Assertion: The author is putting the cart before the horse. She does assume or assert something(s) about the ultimate moral value of the alternative actions she is considering before she finishes the analysis. (please select True or False)
4.Assertion: The analysis is faithful the facts of the case, as given in the case description; it is not altering these facts. (please choose True or False)
5.Assertion: The analysis considers two or more actions, and all of these actions are in the protagonist's power. (please choose True or False)
