58 views5 pages
16 May 2011
School
Course
Professor

Document Summary

Hirschman has a difficulty of explaining the reason why people stay. He understands the voice option but he doesn"t understand the conditions in which people would choose to stay and voice. Why would a consumer/citzen would go, stay back. But he has trouble of defining loyalty its origin and its power to hold exit at bay. Hirschman treats loyalty as an empty bucket with no information other than its ability to postpone exit. Shklar argument has much to do with political evil and the conditions people live in which allow them to stay or move from a country. I t wasn"t that simple to get away from political evil and was a shadow which affected how one framed problems she wanted to work on the relationship between political evil and political loyalty. Exiles are limiting the turner, or the polar case ? worst case assumption and sheds light on political loyalty and political obligation.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers

Related Documents

Related Questions