Philosophy 2080 Lecture Notes - Closed Shop, Intentional Tort, Ginger Beer
5 Feb 2013
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Think: movie theatre, bar, these are businesses that benefit the occupier of lands: (c) That"s right, the defendant argued that even if everything the plaintiff said was true, the law did not recognize this as a law suit. That is why the plaintiff didn"t have to give any evidence, the defendant admitted the truth of her allegations: (b) And remember, it need only be that person"s honestly held opinion, it is not necessary that other people in the community agree with that opinion, the law protects the. A tricky question, because although consideration was ultimately an issue in the case, consideration was only an issue in relation to the promise to keep the offer open. The offer to sell was supported by consideration: (a) Recall, such a term in presumed to be unreasonable, the party seeking to rely on it must show it is reasonable: (b) Quebec as codified all its substantive civil law, ontario has not.
