BUSA 364 Lecture Notes - Lecture 15: Lailani, Contributory Negligence, Product Liability
4 Mar 2013
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
The town of sussex corner owned a bridge. Ruby negligently damaged the bridge by ramming it with a boat. At that point, it would have cost 000 to repair the bridge. Before the town could do so, however, oswald negligently rammed the bridge in a different spot with his own boat. The town had the damage from both incidents repaired at the same time for a total cost of 000. Which of the following statements is true: none of the above. Peter has sued calista and lailani for negligence. The evidence indicates that peter"s injury was caused by the combined effect of negligent acts by himself, calista, and. That injury would not have occurred at all if any one of the three parties had acted carefully. The judge held that calista and lailani are jointly and severally liable.
