POLI 231 Lecture : POLI 231 - Locke 1

103 views2 pages

Document Summary

The state of nature does not provide protection for property. The state is legitimate so far as it protects individual property. Property cannot be taken from an individual without consent. In the beginning, all was held in common. God wanted all men to live and survive. This means that one must be able to assert individual rights over food items, for example. Two ways to do this: consent from all humanity -> impractical, individual body is not held in common -> mix one"s own labour with other things. Two limits: no spoilage proviso: cannot take more than one can use, sufficiency proviso: leave as much for others. With the invention of money, the spoilage proviso is routed, and the sufficiency proviso is eventually violated. Therefore, one must go back to number 1) consent from all humanity. This is manifested in the law and the state. Natural right of self-preservation trumps right of property.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents

Related Questions