TRN125Y1 Study Guide - Subjectivism, Correlation Does Not Imply Causation, Krypto

162 views12 pages

Document Summary

Cultural differences argument: different cultures have different moral codes. Therefore: there is no objective truth in morality. Right and wrong are only matters of opinion, and opinions vary from culture to culture. James rachels argues that the conclusion does not follow from the premises, however the conclusion may still be true (example climate change). Nevertheless the argument is invalid because even if the premises are true the conclusion could be false = not sound. This conclusion is one way of forming the cultural relativism argument. Rachel argues there are 3 consequences of accepting this argument (1) we can"t say that the customs of other societies are morally inferior to our own. Because if right and wrong are relative to culture this must be true for our culture just as much as for others (3) the idea of moral progress is called into doubt. An evaluative premise in an argument may express a moral opinion held by the arguer.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers

Related Documents

Related Questions