TRN125Y1 Study Guide - Subjectivism, Correlation Does Not Imply Causation, Krypto
162 views12 pages
18 Apr 2013
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Cultural differences argument: different cultures have different moral codes. Therefore: there is no objective truth in morality. Right and wrong are only matters of opinion, and opinions vary from culture to culture. James rachels argues that the conclusion does not follow from the premises, however the conclusion may still be true (example climate change). Nevertheless the argument is invalid because even if the premises are true the conclusion could be false = not sound. This conclusion is one way of forming the cultural relativism argument. Rachel argues there are 3 consequences of accepting this argument (1) we can"t say that the customs of other societies are morally inferior to our own. Because if right and wrong are relative to culture this must be true for our culture just as much as for others (3) the idea of moral progress is called into doubt. An evaluative premise in an argument may express a moral opinion held by the arguer.
Get access
Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Related Documents
Related Questions
Rand's Objectivism Aristotle's concept of Virtue Thomas Aquinas' concept of conscience Socrates' concept of excellence |
Sentiment in response to the suffering of others Acknowledging the sufferings of others Acts of altruism Acts contrary to Objectivism |
Setting aside ethical criteria in special cases Taking steps to avoid condemnation of others Using one set of criteria for judging cases concerning ourselves and another for all others Suspending judgment when concerned that the consequences would be too severe |
To indicate that one choice is better than others To show what actions are legal To convey requirements and obligations To indicate that there are really no choices available |
Kant's Categorical Imperative Social Contract Theory Ethical Egoism Gilligan |
A perpetual state of warfare The establishment of a monarchy Taxation to support the costs of government Organized ways to select leaders |
Hydroelectric power Tidal flow generators Biomass waste systems Solar cells |
The social contract according to Locke Deontological ethics according to Mill Natural law ethics according to Aquinas Deontological ethics according to Kant |
Ends-based Economy-based Law-based Efficiency-based |
To determine whether the situation described is accurate To determine whether the premises are true before continuing To determine whether the conclusion proceeds from the premises To determine that there are only two premise statements in the syllogism |
Some choices of action are more realistic than others In deciding to choose one action, the other possible choices will be lost Not everybody involved will be happy with the choice There may be significant personal costs to choosing |
Personal virtues Self-interest Ability to learn lessons Conscience |
Accounting for unintended consequences Fiduciary interests to be honored The amount of happiness produced The principle to be honored |
Rawls' notion of the veil of ignorance Aristotle's notion of the doctrine of the mean Hammurabi's code of law Hobbes' state of nature |
Normative ethics Consequentialist ethics Deontological ethics Interdisciplinary ethics |
Aristotle Luther Augustine Socrates |
Personal standards of behavior for family members Pricing structures for services Non-competition among members Meeting ethical and competency standards in order to practice within a jurisdiction |
There is no deficiency Being broke (having no money) Stinginess Moderation |
conflict resolution systems. objectivist tactics. primary schools of ethics. care-based ethics. |
Principles of ethics Concern for outcomes Emotions Subjective sense of identity |