MKT 100 Study Guide - Syllogism, Genetic Fallacy, Eugenics

• School: Ryerson University
• Department: Marketing
• Course: MKT 100
• Professor: Jennifer Fraser

Document Summary

Phl 214 sample test 2 answers: true or false, all sound arguments are valid. T: an inductively strong argument may be deductively invalid. T: an argument that affirms the consequent is invalid. T: arguments are deductive when they are intended to be valid. T: the following argument is invalid: roses are red, and daffodils are yellow, and lilies are white. Therefore, flowers are probably coloured. t: the genetic fallacy is a kind of red herring. T: in a straw man fallacy, the premises are irrelevant to the conclusion. T: multiple choice, an argument: sally is a mathematician. If she"s a mathematician, she"s bad at art. You are canadian, so you must be human. The argument is (a) invalid (b) valid (c) an instance of affirming the consequent [the argument affirms the antecedent (i. e. , the statement that you"re canadian) and so it"s invalid.