LAW410A Study Guide - Arraignment, Quid Pro Quo, Unconscionability

68 views48 pages

Document Summary

Contracts can: intention to create legal relations. Intention to create legal relations (animus contrahendi: offer and acceptance (consensus ad idem, consideration (quid pro quo) Intention is question of fact: question of law: standard of correctness, question of fact: standard of reasonableness. If they think you did, then you had that intention. Presumptions are inevitable because default position is required and there may be no way of knowing what finite facts are. Most presumptions are rebuttable by facts and parties. In commercial matters there is a presumed intention to create legal relations but this is a rebuttable presumption: general rule: p has to positively prove all elements of the claim on a balance of probabilities. Persuade judge on each and every side that the plaintiff"s side is probably right. Default rule is the defendant wins (if they cannot prove balance of probabilities). Rose and frank co v jr compton and bros ltd, 1924 uk.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers

Related Documents