ADMS 1000 Midterm: review_for_midterm(adms10.docx

126 views3 pages

apricothippopotamus973

25 Mar 2014

School

York University

Department

Administrative Studies

Course

ADMS 1000

Professor

All

For unlimited access to Study Guides, a Grade+ subscription is required.

whitebuffalo5917706 and 39630 others unlocked

ADMS 1000 Full Course Notes

Verified Note

12 documents

Document Summary

General information: exam will be written on february 8 in class. It will be 2. 5 hours in length: please bring your student id, pen and pencil to the exam. A good answer will have a combination of theory, supported by case examples. The exam will cover all material covered up to and including session 4 as per the course schedule. The exam format will consist of 3 parts as follows: 20 multiple choice questions which will be based on chapter 2 concepts. You should know the meanings of the key economic terms/concepts covered in the chapter and in class. For example, you should be able to define gdp and cpi. (20 marks) There will be one short answer theory based question. A small scenario will be provided to which you will apply the required theory to answer the question . (20 marks)

Related Questions

"The M.B.A. and Institutional Outcomes".

The goal of a Capstone course is to measure whether a graduate has achieved the learning outcomes required for the degree being sought. The learning outcomes for all students graduating from the university are identified as:

1. oral, written, and visual communication

2. mathematical data analysis

3. arts and humanities

4. social and behavioral sciences

5. natural and physical sciences

6. competency in major

Each specific program provides a context to these basic outcomes. For the M.B.A. program, you were introduced in your first course to a distinction between becoming an M.B.A. and merely getting an M.B.A. The student who has become an M.B.A. was described as âa problem solver who is able to bring together multiple perspectives, to explain alternatives to others in language they understand, and who operates in ambiguous and uncertain environments without requiring a rulebook.â

In other words, demonstrating your mastery of the M.B.A. program requires not only successful completion of the twelve subject areas in your M.B.A. coursework, but integrating the skills taught in order to evaluate problems, propose solutions, and communicate your results to others.

The M.B. A. program addresses the institutional outcomes in the following ways:

1. oral, written, and visual communication

Students will be able to research problems by critically evaluating sources, constructing well-supported arguments to communicate results to others in written form using A.P.A. format, and orally and visually presenting results using presentation software, spreadsheets, and graphs.

2. mathematical data analysis

Students will be able to employ quantitative methods from appropriate fields to generate evidence to support their conclusions.

3. arts and humanities, social and behavioral sciences, and natural and physical sciences

Students will be able to incorporate ethical, societal, and organizational factors based on humanities, natural and physical science, and social and behavioral sciences into sound decision-making processes.

4. competency in major

Students will employ appropriate concepts from relevant fields of study to inform their problem-solving.

After reading the "The M.B.A. and Institutional Outcomes". Comment on how you feel you have achieved these following outcomes as you have progressed in the M.B.A. program. Have you become an M.B.A instead of just "getting an M.B.A.?" (In 100-150 words)

AEC 316 - Agricultural Marketing
Homework Assignment 2: Chapter 2

Name:____________________ Date:____________________

Multiple choice questions.

There is only one correct answer in multiple choice questions. Please, mark the correct

answer. Each multiple choice question is worth 5 points.

1. A perfectly competitive firmâs demand curve equals its:

Marginal cost curve

Average variable cost curve

Average fixed cost curve

Average revenue curve

None of the above

2. A perfectly competitive firm maximizes profits by setting price equal to:

a. Marginal cost

b. Marginal revenue

c. Average revenue

d. Average total cost

e. Average variable cost

3. In order for a monopoly to continue to be a monopoly:

a. The marginal revenue curve must be downward sloping

b. There must be no close substitutes

c. Marginal revenue must equal marginal costs

d. Average total costs must be decreasing

e. None of the above

4. Marketing strategy which involves dividing a broad target market into subsets of consumers who have, or are perceived to have, common needs, interests, and priorities, and then designing and implementing strategies to target them.

a. Brand name

b. Minor ingredients

c. Market segmentation

d. Product features

e. Packaging

5. What characteristic is indicative of oligopolies?

Low profits

Interdependence of firms

Many firms

Entry is blocked

None of the above

6. At an equilibrium price:

a.The self-interest of consumers is maximized

b.Supply equals demand

c.There is an upward pressure on price

d.There is a downward pressure on price

None of the above

7. When both supply and demand increase, equilibrium quantity will:

a.Decrease

b.Increase

Stay the same

Canât say

None of the above

8. Elasticity is a concept that deals with:

a.Market structure

b.Market equilibrium

c.Perfect competition

d.Consumer and producer sensitivity to changes in prices and income

None of the above

9. A set of competing firms producing similar products or a commodity in a market is called a(n) ___ .

a.Branch

b.Competition

c.Channel

Industry

None of the above

10. A market structure where there is only one buyer of a specific product is called:

a.Monopsony

b.Monopoly

c.Oligopsony

Monopsonistic competition

None of the above

Essay question: 50 points

11. Use the agricultural commodity that you selected in Chapter 1 and choose one agribusiness that buys it. Investigate the agribusiness using the Internet and other resources, and then write an essay addressing all or as many as possible of the following aspects of the agribusiness:

Size

Sales

Scope of product line

Worth (if public)

Number of employees

Locations globally

Market structure

Industry sector

All your answers/discussion should be typed in one essay that is at least 15 lines long (using formal English, correct paragraph and sentence structure, and making sure your ideas flow well from one sentence to another) using Times New Roman, 12 point, double space and 1-inch margins all around. Before submitting the final essay, use the âSpelling & Grammarâ function of the MS Word to correct grammar.

At the end of your essay, provide the full citation record in alphabetical order in your list of references. For examples, visit: http://www.saea.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/reference-style-sheet.pdf. Please, note that the list of references does not count toward the minimum required 15 lines. Include your references in the text as â(Smith, 2015)â when citing at the end of a sentence, or âAccording to Smith (2015)â when citing at the beginning of a sentence. For example,

Negative publicity is a key determinant affecting consumersâ buying decisions (Ahluwalia, Burnkrant, and Unnava, 2000).

According to Cawley and Rizzo (2005), pharmaceutical products in the same therapeutic class experienced negative spillover in terms of lost sales.

Note: Most of the future essay questions will build on this essay question and/or the one agricultural commodity that you choose. This means that if there is little information on the agricultural commodity that you have chosen for this essay question, you should consider choosing a more common agricultural commodity on which ample information is available. In addition, this course will require you to compile all your answers to the essay questions into one term paper to be submitted by the end of the course. This means that the more effort you put into answering essay questions now, the more material you will have accumulated for your term paper by the end of the semester.

TYPE YOUR ANSWER TO THE ESSAY QUESTION 11 BELOW USING AS MUCH SPACE AS YOU NEED. THEN, PRINT THE HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT AND SUBMIT THE HARD COPY.

Write a summary of of this article below. You should write at least one paragraph.

ABSTRACT
Feminist theories in sociology reflect the rich diversity of general theoretical
orientations in our discipline; there is no one form of feminist theory. The development
of these theories over the last 25 years has only recently begun to
influence the mainstream theory canon, which has much to learn from their insights.
This chapter demonstrates why feminist versions of the following theory
types should be more fully integrated into mainstream sociological theory:
neo-Marxist, macro-structural, exchange, rational choice, network, status expectations,
symbolic interactionist, ethnomethodological, neo-Freudian, and social
role. Feminist standpoint theory, an epistemological critique of mainstream sociology,
is discussed at the beginning, and the chapter concludes with a brief
account of the newly developing effort to theorize the intersection of race, class,
and gender.
INTRODUCTION
The term âfeminist theoryâ is used to refer to a myriad of kinds of works, produced
by movement activists and scholars in a variety of disciplines; these are
not mutually exclusive and include: (a) normative discussions of how societies
and relationships ought to be structured, their current inequities, and strategies to
achieve equity; (b) critiques of androcentric classical theories, concepts, epistemologies,
and assumptions; (c) epistemological discussions of what constitute
appropriate forms, subject matters, and techniques of theorizing from a feminist
perspective; and (d ) explanatory theories of the relationship between gender and

various social, cultural, economic, psychological, and political structures and
processes. Much of this work is explicitly interdisciplinary in inspiration and
intended audience. To complicate matters further, there is no consensus on the
exact meaning of the word âfeminist,â which makes it difficult to distinguish
with precision between theoretical material that pertains to gender (e.g. Parsons
1949, 1955, which no one would label feminist) and gender-related theory that
is specifically âfeminist.â Finally, there is little consensus among feminist sociologists
about the basic theoretical questions that require an answer, resulting
in the proliferation of theories at a low level of abstraction that explain specific
phenomena (e.g. pay inequity), in addition to more abstract, general works.
To remain within the limits of one chapter, I confine this review in several
ways, beginning by excluding feminist theory that has not been produced or used
extensively by sociologists. While feminist theory is often defined as âwomencenteredâ
(e.g. Lengermann & Niebrugge 1996:436; Smith 1979, 1987; Alway
1995), I use a definition that focuses more broadly on gender, yet maintains the
normative emphasis implied by all definitions of the term feminist, which thus
enables one to distinguish feminist from other gender-relevant theory.

Some feminists focus on those contemporary theories and texts that ignore
the contributions of feminist theories and the topic of gender and conclude that
feminist contributions remain largely ghettoized within our discipline (e.g.Ward
& Grant 1991, Alway 1995). My view is that, while progress has been made
in integrating feminist concerns and insights into the disciplineâs theoretical
discourse, much work remains to be done. This chapter demonstrates the
abundance and variety of feminist theoretical insights that can and already have
to some extent contributed to a more robust theoretical understanding of social
life, one which reflects the centrality of gender in virtually all sociocultural
contexts. It also demonstrates that feminist theories emanate from, critique, and
revise the rich array of theoretical traditions that define our discipline. Space
limitations preclude much discussion of precisely how feminist theories can be
better integrated with mainstream ones. Rather, I focus attention primarily on
reviewing the central insights of feminist theories in order to better inform those
sociologists who may be unfamiliar with much of this body of work about the
rich array of theoretical ideas that are at their disposal.

EPISTEMOLOGICAL ISSUES
Much of the literature that is labeled âfeminist theoryâ consists of epistemology
and epistemological critiques of âmalestreamâ sociology. Its foundations reflect
several nonfeminist traditions, especially Marxâs and Mannheimâs discussions
of ideology, Foucaultâs work on knowledge and power, and phenomenological
and ethnomethodological approaches, the exact mix of influences varying by
author. While this work makes important contributions to these traditions, for
two reasons I believe that it is a misnomer to call thiswork feminist epistemology
(or theory). First, the issues raised are not in any fundamental way different
from those raised by many scholars who haveworked in these traditions but have
not been interested specifically in women or committed to feminism. Feminists
extend their insights in important ways, but this does not constitute a uniquely feminist approach to sociology. Second, many women in sociology, whose
scholarship they and others consider as well within the feminist tradition, do
not agree with this perspective.
Feminist scholars in a number of disciplines critique what they define as
mainstream, âmasculinist,â âobjectivist,â and âpositivistâ social science, and
develop a âfeministâ alternative called standpoint theory. In sociology, the
two most widely cited are Dorothy Smith (especially 1987, 1990, also 1979,
1989) and Patricia Hill Collins (especially 1990, also 1986, 1989), whose basic
ideas constitute the focus of this section (see also Harding 1986, 1991). Where
Smith focuses on developing a âwomanâs standpoint,â Collinsâ work is directed
at an Afrocentric feminist standpoint epistemology. The Issue of Essentialism
Feminist standpoint theory, which is highly attuned to reification committed by
mainstream sociologists, cannot avoid reifying the genders. While Smith and
Collins explicitly recognize considerable variation among women (and presumably
men) in their experiences and consciousness, their own logics, and
many times wording, make it clear that they assume that there are overarching,
gender-specific standpoints; they could not otherwise talk about a âmasculineâ
form of discourse. In addition, Collins explicitly cites such feminist theorists
as Gilligan (1982) and Chodorow (1978, also 1974), who argue that the
genders are fundamentally different in their moral reasoning and capacities
for/commitments to interpersonal relationships.
Positing dichotomous gender differences that are treated as transcultural and
transhistorical is termed âessentialism,â a view that has substantial currency
among feminists in a variety of disciplines but is hotly contested in our own
(e.g. Lorber et al 1981, Coser 1989, Epstein 1988). The empirical evidence for
it is flawed, often based on small, nonrandom, American samples, and typically
finds only modest differences, along with extensive overlap, between the sexes.
Essentialist thinking converts differences of degree into differences of kind. The
presumed but often unstated origin of essential differences includes psychodynamics
rooted in the parental division of labor (Chodorow 1978) and biological
sex (Rossi 1977, 1984). It has become common for feminist scholars to recognize
within-gender categorical differences (e.g. race, class), but this awareness
of difference has often failed to preclude essentialist thinking about basic personality
and value orientations (e.g. the assumption that, regardless of other
differences, women are nurturant and oriented toward personal relationships,
while men are individuating and oriented toward abstract moral principles).
Given that the evidence suggests modest between-sex and considerable withinsex
differences on virtually all individual-level traits, a dichotomous gender
variable is theoretically useless when speaking of individual-level phenomena.
Explanations that begin by categorically attributing different characteristics
to women and menâcognitive, emotional, relational, and/or behavioralânot
only exaggerate differences in the distribution of such traits by gender, they also
implicitly treat these variables as dichotomous rather than continuous.

ADMS 1000 Midterm: review_for_midterm(adms10.docx

ADMS 1000 Full Course Notes

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

ADMS 1000 Lecture 5: Session 5B

ADMS 1000 Study Guide - Final Guide: Aviva Centre, Tennis Canada, Profit Maximization

ADMS 1000 Study Guide - Midterm Guide: Coltan, Planned Economy, Conflict Resource

Related Questions