PHL271H1 Lecture : N/A__

71 views6 pages
School
Department
Course
Professor

Document Summary

State is only allowed to interfere if the harm is harming others. The harm principle isn"t really accepted in canadian law: r vs. malow levine, r vs caine, background and case facts, majority and should the harm principle be recognized in pfj. No: dissent and should the principle the law cannot, equality-what is it and why value it, why do we care about it, charles taylor. The questions was whether the government could criminalize the mere possession of marijuana. If the state chooses to criminalize that, that violate. And these limitations are given by whatever principles the courts see as part of fundamental justice justice, that limitation is okay. In addition to the internal limitation provided by the principles of. Gives a large area of discretion to judges. If that deprivation is in accordance with the principles of fundamental o o fundamental justice, there is also an external limitation is section 1.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents