MLL111 Study Guide - Final Guide: Specific Performance, Time Express, Foxtel

51 views20 pages
27 Jul 2018
Course
Professor

Document Summary

Remedies: self help, withholding performance, termination, deposit, enforcement, specific performance. Johnson v agnew: exemplary damages to punish not for contracts, hospitality group v aru. Intentions: subjective approach reasonable observer, commercial presumed to exist, bi(cid:374)di(cid:374)g (cid:858)i(cid:374) ho(cid:374)ou(cid:396) o(cid:374)l(cid:455)(cid:859, rose and frank company v jr crompton bros ltd [1923] 2. Kb 261 explicitly agreed that it is not contract. Incomplete essential terms not agreed, contract will be void: nzi insurance australia ltd v baryzcka 85 sasr 497 amount of rent in lease, agreement offer and acceptance. Intended offer: carlill v carbolic smoke ball co [1893] 1 qb 256; [1891] all er rep. 127; (1892) 57 jp 325; (1892) 62 ljqb 257; (1892) 67 lt 837; (1892) 4 r 176; (1892) 9 tlr 124; (1892) 41 wr 210. Invitation to treat: pharmaceutical society of great britain v boots cash chemists (southern) ltd [1953] 1 qb 401; [1953] 1 all er 482; [1953] 2.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers

Related Documents