Study Guides (248,173)
Australia (3,443)
Law (105)
JSB171 (74)
All (9)
Final

Prior Inconsistent Statements in Cross-Examination

5 Pages
55 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Law
Course
JSB171
Professor
All Professors
Semester
Spring

Description
Nick Dowse Prior Inconsistent Statements in Cross-Examination Prior Inconsistent Statements in Cross-Examination – Structure of Answer These may be either written or oral. As counsel is cross-examining the other party’s witness, no need to prove witness is adverse before any PIS can be put to them in cross-examination. Section 18(1) QEA allows cross-examining counsel to go and prove that the witness made a PIS, subject to satisfying requirements of s 18: • Witness is being cross-examined? [Yes]. • Former statement is relative to the main facts in issue? IF relative to MFII Here, [fact] is main fact in issue because goes to proving [element of action]. IF not relative to MFII Here, [fact] is collateral not main fact in issue because it is about [credit]. Thus s 18 has no application & s 101 will apply such that PIS is deemed to be the truth. Cross-examining counsel can still go ahead and prove PIS was made but will only affect credit of witness (eg. bias). However, must satisfy finality rule. • Former statement is inconsistent with present testimony (PIS is made)? [Yes]. • Witness given opportunity to admit they made a PIS? Must mention to the witness the circumstances of the supposed statement sufficient to identify the statement and occasion and witness must be asked whether they made the PIS: s 18(2) (reflects rule in Browne v Dunn) • Witness does not distinctly admit or deny that they made the PIS? Possible responses by witness of a PIS in cross-examination: (1) IF admit that they made PIS and that it is true • PIS becomes part of the witness’s testimony but only goes to the credit of the witness • The PIS is not being proved pursuant to s 18 and s 101 will not apply either (2) IF admit that they made the PIS but that it was NOT true • The PIS is deemed to be the truth pursuant to s 18 and s 101 (3) IF does not distinctly admit or deny that they ever made the statement • Prove that the witness made the PIS (using evidence of another witness eg. call police officer) • The PIS is deemed to be the truth by virtue of s 18 and s 101 – jury directed must accepted PIS as true evidence. • The weight attached to the PIS is a matter for the jury (s 102). Considering: (a) Contemporaneity (time between when PIS made and incident – closer in time, the better); and (b) whether maker of PIS has incentive to conceal or misrepresent facts (eg. knows one of the parties involved in the case) s 18 QEA – Proof of previous inconsistent statement of witness (1) If a witness upon cross-examination as to a former statement made by the witness relative to the subject matter of the proceeding and inconsistent with the present Page 1 of 5 Nick Dowse Prior Inconsistent Statements in Cross-Examination testimony of the witness does not distinctly admit that the witness has made such statement, proof may be given that the witness did in fact make it. (2) However, before such proof can be given, the circumstances of the supposed statement sufficient to designate the particular occasion must be mentioned to the witness and the witness must be asked whether or not the witness has made such statement. R v Mursic • Accused charged with violence against own wife • During an argument threw petrol over her and lit her on fire • His wife was interviewed by police after the assault in hospital and she told them that the accused (her husband) bashed her and set her on fire • By trial the wife had reconciled with her husband and the Crown did not call her to give evidence • The wife instead gave evidence for the defence – favourable to the accused • In cross-examination by the Crown, it was put to her that she had given this statement to police which was accordance with the Crown case • The wife agreed that she had made a statement to the police but denied that what she told the police was true because she had been ill at the time (upset, in hospital) • Was the statement made to the police relevant to the subject matter of the proceedings (i.e. the main facts in issue – grievous bodily harm)? – YES • Held that s 18 permits proof of PIS put to witness upon cross-examination if he ‘doesn’t distinctly admit that he has made such statement’ • The wife never distinctly admitted what was contained in the statement was what she told police • By virtue of s 18, her PIS (to police that her husband bashed her and set her on fire) was admissible of evidence of any fact stated therein of which oral evidence would be admissible • Section 101 then applied to make her PIS evidence of the truth of its contents Written PIS Here, there is a written PIS. 1. Is the document made, verified or adopted by the author? IF NO – not made by author [FIRST LIMB OF QUEENS CASE] Here, document is not made by [witness] or adopted by [witness] by their signature. As witness is not author – s 19 does not apply. Apply Queen’s case (limb 1) instead. Counsel cannot read the document to the Court unless it has already been admitted. IF YES – made by author Here, yes the document is made by [witness] / adopted/verified by [witness] by their signature/acknowledge on oath (Eg. police witness statement) 2. Is the statement in writing relative to the subject matter? IF YES (MFII) Here, [PIS] is main fact in issue because goes to proving [element of action]. Therefore, s 19 will be applied. Counsel may cross-examine witness without showing the document: s 19(1) QEA. However, witness must be directed to those parts of the document which are alleged to show the inconsistency: s 19(1A) QEA. Court may compel cross-examiner to produce document and court may use
More Less

Related notes for JSB171

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit